Literature DB >> 21799919

Complex interplay of evolutionary forces in the ladybird homeobox genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Evgeniy S Balakirev1, Maria Anisimova, Francisco J Ayala.   

Abstract

Tandemly arranged paralogous genes lbe and lbl are members of the Drosophila NK homeobox family. We analyzed population samples of Drosophila melanogaster from Africa, Europe, North and South America, and single strains of D. sechellia, D. simulans, and D. yakuba within two linked regions encompassing partial sequences of lbe and lbl. The evolution of lbe and lbl is highly constrained due to their important regulatory functions. Despite this, a variety of forces have shaped the patterns of variation in lb genes: recombination, intragenic gene conversion and natural selection strongly influence background variation created by linkage disequilibrium and dimorphic haplotype structure. The two genes exhibited similar levels of nucleotide diversity and positive selection was detected in the noncoding regions of both genes. However, synonymous variability was significantly higher for lbe: no nonsynonymous changes were observed in this gene. We argue that balancing selection impacts some synonymous sites of the lbe gene. Stability of mRNA secondary structure was significantly different between the lbe (but not lbl) haplotype groups and may represent a driving force of balancing selection in epistatically interacting synonymous sites. Balancing selection on synonymous sites may be the first, or one of a few such observations, in Drosophila. In contrast, recurrent positive selection on lbl at the protein level influenced evolution at three codon sites. Transcription factor binding-site profiles were different for lbe and lbl, suggesting that their developmental functions are not redundant. Combined with our previous results on nucleotide variation in esterase and other homeobox genes, these results suggest that interplay of balancing and directional selection may be a general feature of molecular evolution in Drosophila and other eukaryote genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799919      PMCID: PMC3142176          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  100 in total

1.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites.

Authors:  Z Yang; R Nielsen; N Goldman; A M Pedersen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 3.  Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Jeffrey D Jensen; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A powerful score test to detect positive selection in genome-wide scans.

Authors:  Ming Zhong; Kenneth Lange; Jeanette C Papp; Ruzong Fan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations.

Authors:  Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Emerging principles of regulatory evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Drosophila NK-homeobox genes.

Authors:  Y Kim; M Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Kevin R Thornton; Brian Charlesworth; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  5 in total

1.  CodonPhyML: fast maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation under codon substitution models.

Authors:  Manuel Gil; Marcelo Serrano Zanetti; Stefan Zoller; Maria Anisimova
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Bringing molecules back into molecular evolution.

Authors:  Claus O Wilke
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Lucilia cuprina genome unlocks parasitic fly biology to underpin future interventions.

Authors:  Clare A Anstead; Pasi K Korhonen; Neil D Young; Ross S Hall; Aaron R Jex; Shwetha C Murali; Daniel S T Hughes; Siu F Lee; Trent Perry; Andreas J Stroehlein; Brendan R E Ansell; Bert Breugelmans; Andreas Hofmann; Jiaxin Qu; Shannon Dugan; Sandra L Lee; Hsu Chao; Huyen Dinh; Yi Han; Harsha V Doddapaneni; Kim C Worley; Donna M Muzny; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Robert M Waterhouse; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Peter J James; Neil H Bagnall; Andrew C Kotze; Richard A Gibbs; Stephen Richards; Philip Batterham; Robin B Gasser
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  DNA polymorphism and selection at the bindin locus in three Strongylocentrotus sp. (Echinoidea).

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Maria Anisimova; Vladimir A Pavlyuchkov; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Unraveling patterns of site-to-site synonymous rates variation and associated gene properties of protein domains and families.

Authors:  Slavica Dimitrieva; Maria Anisimova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.