Literature DB >> 15126398

Nucleotide variation and recombination along the fourth chromosome in Drosophila simulans.

Wen Wang1, Kevin Thornton, J J Emerson, Manyuan Long.   

Abstract

The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster and its sister species are believed to be nonrecombining and have been a model system for testing predictions of the effects of selection on linked, neutral variation. We recently examined nucleotide variation along the chromosome of D. melanogaster and revealed that a low average level of recombination could be associated with considerably high levels of nucleotide variation. In this report, we further investigate the variation along the fourth chromosome of D. simulans. We sequenced 12 gene regions evenly distributed along the fourth chromosome for a worldwide collection of 11 isofemale lines and 5 gene regions in a local population of 10 isofemale lines from South America. In contrast to predictions for regions of very low recombination, these data reveal that the variation levels in many gene regions, including an intron region of the ci gene, vary considerably along the fourth chromosome. Nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0010 to 0.0074 in 9 gene regions interspersed with several regions of greatly reduced variation. Tests of recombination indicate that the recombination level is not as low as previously thought, likely an order of magnitude higher than that in D. melanogaster. Finally, estimates of the recombination parameters are shown to support a crossover-plus-conversion model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126398      PMCID: PMC1470817          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

1.  The coalescent with gene conversion.

Authors:  C Wiuf; J Hein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis.

Authors:  J Rozas; R Rozas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Gene conversion and different population histories may explain the contrast between polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium levels.

Authors:  L Frisse; R R Hudson; A Bartoszewicz; J D Wall; J Donfack; A Di Rienzo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence.

Authors:  M Kreitman; R R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Restriction fragment length polymorphism and divergence in the genomic regions of high and low recombination in self-fertilizing and cross-fertilizing aegilops species.

Authors:  J Dvorák; M C Luo; Z L Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Restriction-map variation at the zeste-tko region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Aguadé; N Miyashita; C H Langley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  16 in total

1.  A new retroposed gene in Drosophila heterochromatin detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Chuanzhu Fan; Manyuan Long
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  The dot chromosome of Drosophila: insights into chromatin states and their change over evolutionary time.

Authors:  Nicole C Riddle; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Translocation of Y-linked genes to the dot chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Mohamed A F Noor; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Recent selection on the Y-to-dot translocation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Testing for effects of recombination rate on nucleotide diversity in natural populations of Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Stephen I Wright; John Paul Foxe; Leah DeRose-Wilson; Akira Kawabe; Mark Looseley; Brandon S Gaut; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Nonrecombining genes in a recombination environment: the Drosophila "dot" chromosome.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Powell; Kirstin Dion; Montserrat Papaceit; Montserrat Aguadé; Saverio Vicario; Ryan C Garrick
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Population genomic inferences from sparse high-throughput sequencing of two populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Rob J Kulathinal; Casey M Bergman; Aaron R Quinlan; Erik B Dopman; Mauricio Carneiro; Gabor T Marth; Daniel L Hartl; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Low linkage disequilibrium in wild Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations.

Authors:  Caroline Harris; François Rousset; Isabelle Morlais; Didier Fontenille; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.