Literature DB >> 20940345

Nonrecombining genes in a recombination environment: the Drosophila "dot" chromosome.

Jeffrey R Powell1, Kirstin Dion, Montserrat Papaceit, Montserrat Aguadé, Saverio Vicario, Ryan C Garrick.   

Abstract

Rate of recombination is a powerful variable affecting several aspects of molecular variation and evolution. A nonrecombining portion of the genome of most Drosophila species, the "dot" chromosome or F element, exhibits very low levels of variation and unusual codon usage. One lineage of Drosophila, the willistoni/saltans groups, has the F element fused to a normally recombining E element. Here, we present polymorphism data for genes on the F element in two Drosophila willistoni and one D. insularis populations, genes previously studied in D. melanogaster. The D. willistoni populations were known to be very low in inversion polymorphism, thus minimizing the recombination suppression effect of inversions. We first confirmed, by in situ hybridization, that D. insularis has the same E + F fusion as D. willistoni, implying this was a monophyletic event. A clear gradient in codon usage exists along the willistoni F element, from the centromere distally to the fusion with E; estimates of recombination rates parallel this gradient and also indicate D. insularis has greater recombination than D. willistoni. In contrast to D. melanogaster, genes on the F element exhibit moderate levels of nucleotide polymorphism not distinguishable from two genes elsewhere in the genome. Although some linkage disequilibrium (LD) was detected between polymorphic sites within genes (generally <500 bp apart), no long-range LD between F element loci exists in the two willistoni group species. In general, the distribution of allele frequencies of F element genes display the typical pattern of expectations of neutral variation at equilibrium. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that recombination allows the accumulation of nucleotide variation as well as allows selection to act on synonymous codon usage. It is estimated that the fusion occurred ∼20 Mya and while the F element in the willistoni lineage has evolved "normal" levels and patterns of nucleotide variation, equilibrium may not have been reached for codon usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20940345      PMCID: PMC3002241          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  43 in total

1.  A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; A J Betancourt; V B Kaiser; I Gordo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2009-09-04

3.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection.

Authors:  Y X Fu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Adh nucleotide variation in Drosophila willistoni: high replacement polymorphism in an electrophoretically monomorphic protein.

Authors:  E C Griffith; J R Powell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Molecular organization of the X chromosome in different species of the obscura group of Drosophila.

Authors:  C Segarra; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Saverio Vicario; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jeffrey R Powell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Reassignment of Drosophila willistoni Genome Scaffolds to Chromosome II Arms.

Authors:  Carolina Garcia; Alejandra Delprat; Alfredo Ruiz; Vera L S Valente
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Cytogenetic mapping of the Muller F element genes in Drosophila willistoni group.

Authors:  Sebastián Pita; Yanina Panzera; Vera Lúcia da Silva Valente; Zilpa das Graças Silva de Melo; Carolina Garcia; Ana Cristina Lauer Garcia; Martín Alejandro Montes; Claudia Rohde
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Patterns of evolutionary conservation of microsatellites (SSRs) suggest a faster rate of genome evolution in Hymenoptera than in Diptera.

Authors:  Eckart Stolle; Jonathan H Kidner; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Ancestral Chromatin Configuration Constrains Chromatin Evolution on Differentiating Sex Chromosomes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Qi Zhou; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  The Drosophila Dot Chromosome: Where Genes Flourish Amidst Repeats.

Authors:  Nicole C Riddle; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Establishment and evolution of heterochromatin.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Mujahid Ali; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Comparative Cytology of Female Meiosis I Among Drosophila Species.

Authors:  Ahmed Majekodunmi; Amelia O Bowen; William D Gilliland
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.