Literature DB >> 15118840

Acetabular reconstruction in developmental hip dysplasia using reinforcement ring with a hook.

Rocco P Pitto1, Nils Schikora.   

Abstract

We followed prospectively 27 patients with severe acetabular bone-stock deficiencies due to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Mean preoperative patient age was 56 (34-78) years, mean Harris hip score was 31 (16-66) points and pre-operative mean acetabular angle of Sharp was 47 degrees (34 degrees - 61 degrees). Operative acetabular reconstruction was performed in 28 hips using reinforcement ring with a hook placed in the true acetabulum and autologous bone grafting. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up was available in 27 hips. Mean Harris hip score improved to 91 (70-100) points. There were no clinical or radiological signs of aseptic loosening in 25 hips, and the bone graft was radiologically incorporated in all hips. In 24 hips, a radiostereometric analysis showed low rates of non-progressive translation and rotation in 21 reinforcement rings. Three rings showed progressive translation and/or rotation at the 2-year follow-up and were rated probably loose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118840      PMCID: PMC3456938          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0559-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Mid-term migration of a cemented total hip replacement assessed by radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  J Alfaro-Adrian; H S Gill; B E Marks; D W Murray
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Migration of porous coated acetabular prostheses fixed with screws: roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  J Kärrholm; F Snorrason
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Reconstruction of the hypoplastic acetabulum in cementless arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  M Zlatić; B Radojević; C Lazović
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.

Authors:  R C Johnston; R H Fitzgerald; W H Harris; R Poss; M E Müller; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Total hip replacement with bone grafting using the removed femoral head in severe acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  G Stringa; R P Pitto; G V Di Muria; M Marcucci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates.

Authors:  S A Yoder; R A Brand; D R Pedersen; T W O'Gorman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bone grafting in cementless total hip replacement for congenital dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  X Dai; H Omori; Y Okumura; M Ando; H Oki; N Hashimoto; H Baba
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Charnley arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or subluxation of the hip.

Authors:  F Linde; J Jensen; S Pilgaard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J F Crowe; V J Mani; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Total hip replacement for coxarthrosis secondary to congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip. Long-term results.

Authors:  J R MacKenzie; S S Kelley; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  Total hip replacement in congenital high hip dislocation following iliofemoral monotube distraction.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Martin Pfeiffer; Jochen G Hofstaetter; Richard Lass; Rainer I Kotz; Alexander Giurea
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; D Bürklein; F Greimel; U Nöth; M Hoberg; H Gollwitzer; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Current concept in dysplastic hip arthroplasty: Techniques for acetabular and femoral reconstruction.

Authors:  Goran Bicanic; Katarina Barbaric; Ivan Bohacek; Ana Aljinovic; Domagoj Delimar
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

4.  Favorable survival of acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Matthijs P Somford; Stefan B T Bolder; Jean W M Gardeniers; Tom J J H Slooff; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Hannu T Aro; Charles Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.