Literature DB >> 15109331

Developing a peer review process for web-based curricula: minting a new coin of the realm.

Christopher L Knight1, Henry A Sakowski, Bruce L Houghton, Mary B Laya, Dawn E DeWitt.   

Abstract

The World Wide Web creates new challenges and opportunities for medical educators. Prominent among these are the lack of consistent standards by which to evaluate web-based educational tools. We present the instrument that was used to review web-based innovations in medical education submissions to the 2003 Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) national meeting, and discuss the process used by the SGIM web-based clinical curriculum interest group to develop the instrument. The 5 highest-ranked submissions are summarized with commentary from the reviewers.

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15109331      PMCID： PMC1492336          DOI： 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30218.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN： 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  10 in total

1.  Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.

Authors:  P Kim; T R Eng; M J Deering; A Maxfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

3.  Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures?

Authors:  A Sekikawa; D J Aaron; B Acosta; E Sa; R E LaPorte
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Web-based case simulations for a primary care clerkship.

Authors:  H A Sakowski; E C Rich; P D Turner
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Approaches to experiential learning, course delivery and validation in medicine. A background document.

Authors:  F Stanton; J Grant
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 6.  ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning.

Authors:  Judy McKimm; Carol Jollie; Peter Cantillon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-19

7.  Medical teaching websites: do they reflect the learning paradigm?

Authors:  Pradeep Alur; Kaniz Fatima; Roy Joseph
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  The need to train residents to write effectively.

Authors:  W L Smith
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  How many people have ever lived on earth?

Authors:  C Haub
Journal:  Popul Today       Date:  1995-02

10.  Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education.

Authors:  R B Friedman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.893
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  An emerging renaissance in medical education.

Authors:  William T Branch; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Quality specifications in postgraduate medical e-learning: an integrative literature review leading to a postgraduate medical e-learning model.

Authors:  R A De Leeuw; Michiel Westerman; E Nelson; J C F Ket; F Scheele
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.463
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.