Literature DB >> 16269100

Specificity of the effect of a nicotinic receptor polymorphism on individual differences in visuospatial attention.

Pamela M Greenwood1, John A Fossella, Raja Parasuraman.   

Abstract

Cortical neurotransmitter availability is known to exert domain-specific effects on cognitive performance. Hence, normal variation in genes with a role in neurotransmission may also have specific effects on cognition. We tested this hypothesis by examining associations between polymorphisms in genes affecting cholinergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission and individual differences in visuospatial attention. Healthy individuals were administered a cued visual search task which varied the size of precues to the location of a target letter embedded in a 15-letter array. Cues encompassed 1, 3, 9, or 15 letters. Search speed increased linearly with precue size, indicative of a spatial attentional scaling mechanism. The strength of attentional scaling increased progressively with the number of C alleles (0, 1, or 2) of the alpha-4 nicotinic receptor gene C1545T polymorphism (n = 104). No association was found for the dopamine beta hydroxylase gene G444A polymorphism (n = 135). These findings point to the specificity of genetic neuromodulation. Whereas variation in a gene linked to cholinergic transmission systematically modulated the ability to scale the focus of visuospatial attention, variation in a gene governing dopamine availability did not. The results show that normal variation in a gene controlling a nicotinic receptor makes a selective contribution to individual differences in visuospatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269100      PMCID: PMC1350930          DOI: 10.1162/089892905774597281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  50 in total

1.  Scale of attentional focus in visual search.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-07

2.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides; P A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Alteration of brain noradrenergic activity in rhesus monkeys affects the alerting component of covert orienting.

Authors:  E A Witte; R T Marrocco
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  An insertion mutation of the CHRNA4 gene in a family with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  O K Steinlein; A Magnusson; J Stoodt; S Bertrand; S Weiland; S F Berkovic; K O Nakken; P Propping; D Bertrand
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Effects of altering brain cholinergic activity on covert orienting of attention: comparison of monkey and human performance.

Authors:  E A Witte; M C Davidson; R T Marrocco
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on spatial attention, working memory, and their interaction in healthy, middle-aged adults: results From the National Institute of Mental Health's BIOCARD study.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Chantal Lambert; Trey Sunderland; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Beyond heritability: neurotransmitter genes differentially modulate visuospatial attention and working memory.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Pamela M Greenwood; Reshma Kumar; John Fossella
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

Review 8.  Nicotinic acetylcholine involvement in cognitive function in animals.

Authors:  E D Levin; B B Simon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Cholinergic switching within neocortical inhibitory networks.

Authors:  Z Xiang; J R Huguenard; D A Prince
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dopamine beta-hydroxylase: two polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium at the structural gene DBH associate with biochemical phenotypic variation.

Authors:  J F Cubells; D P van Kammen; M E Kelley; G M Anderson; D T O'Connor; L H Price; R Malison; P A Rao; K Kobayashi; T Nagatsu; J Gelernter
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  25 in total

1.  Pharmacogenetics of smoking cessation: role of nicotine target and metabolism genes.

Authors:  Allison B Gold; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Variation in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene cluster CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 and its interaction with recent tobacco use influence cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Huiping Zhang; Henry R Kranzler; James Poling; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Modulation of nicotine effects on selective attention by DRD2 and CHRNA4 gene polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stefan Ahrens; Sebastian Markett; Thomas P K Breckel; Oliver Behler; Martin Reuter; Christiane M Thiel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention.

Authors:  Signe Vangkilde; Claus Bundesen; Jennifer T Coull
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cognitive Control, the Anterior Cingulate, and Nicotinic Receptors: A Case of Heterozygote Advantage.

Authors:  Jason Smucny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neurogenetic effects on cognition in aging brains: a window of opportunity for intervention?

Authors:  Ivar Reinvang; Ian J Deary; Anders M Fjell; Vidar M Steen; Thomas Espeseth; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Variations in catechol-O-methyltransferase gene interact with parenting to influence attention in early development.

Authors:  P Voelker; B E Sheese; M K Rothbart; M I Posner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Relating dopaminergic and cholinergic polymorphisms to spatial attention in infancy.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Dante Cicchetti; Susan Hetzel; Kathleen M Thomas
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03

10.  Both a nicotinic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and a noradrenergic SNP modulate working memory performance when attention is manipulated.

Authors:  Pamela M Greenwood; Ramya Sundararajan; Ming-Kuan Lin; Reshma Kumar; Karl J Fryxell; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.