Literature DB >> 19211801

Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

P M Greenwood1, M-K Lin, R Sundararajan, K J Fryxell, R Parasuraman.   

Abstract

It is widely appreciated that neurotransmission systems interact in their effects on human cognition, but those interactions have been little studied. We used genetics to investigate pharmacological evidence of synergisms in nicotinic/muscarinic interactions on cognition. We hypothesized that joint influences of nicotinic and muscarinic systems would be reflected in cognitive effects of normal variation in known SNPs in nicotinic (CHRNA4 rs1044396) and muscarinic (CHRM2 rs8191992) receptor genes. Exp. 1 used a task of cued visual search. The slope of the cue size/reaction time function showed a trend level effect of the muscarinic CHRM2 SNP, no effect of the nicotinic CHRNA4 SNP, but a significant interaction between the 2 SNPs. Slopes were steepest in individuals who were both CHRNA4 C/C and CHRM2 T/T homozygotes. To determine the specificity of this synergism, Exp. 2 assessed working memory for 1-3 locations over 3 s and found no significant effects on either SNP. Interpreting these results in light of Sarter's [Briand LA, et al. (2007) Modulators in concert for cognition: Modulator interactions in the prefrontal cortex. Prog Neurobiol 83:69-91] claims of tonic and phasic modes of cholinergic activity, we argue that reorienting attention to the target after invalid cues requires a phasic response, dependent on the nicotinic system, whereas orienting attention to valid cues requires a tonic response, dependent on the muscarinic system. Consistent with that, shifting and scaling after valid cues (tonic) were strongest in CHRNA4 C/C homozygotes who were also CHRM2 T/T homozygotes. This shows synergistic effects within the human cholinergic system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19211801      PMCID: PMC2651349          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807891106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  66 in total

1.  Muscarinic m1 and m2 receptor proteins in local circuit and projection neurons of the primate striatum: anatomical evidence for cholinergic modulation of glutamatergic prefronto-striatal pathways.

Authors:  A A Alcantara; L Mrzljak; R L Jakab; A I Levey; S M Hersch; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Association of attentional network function with exon 5 variations of the CHRNA4 gene.

Authors:  Georg Winterer; Francesco Musso; Andreas Konrad; Goran Vucurevic; Peter Stoeter; Thomas Sander; Jürgen Gallinat
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Combined nicotinic and muscarinic blockade in elderly normal volunteers: cognitive, behavioral, and physiologic responses.

Authors:  J T Little; D N Johnson; M Minichiello; H Weingartner; T Sunderland
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

5.  Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on spatial attention, working memory, and their interaction in healthy, middle-aged adults: results From the National Institute of Mental Health's BIOCARD study.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Chantal Lambert; Trey Sunderland; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine.

Authors:  Venkata S Mattay; Terry E Goldberg; Francesco Fera; Ahmad R Hariri; Alessandro Tessitore; Michael F Egan; Bhaskar Kolachana; Joseph H Callicott; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cholinergic neurotransmission influences covert orientation of visuospatial attention in the rat.

Authors:  J M Phillips; K McAlonan; W G Robb; V J Brown
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of Nucleus Basalis Magnocellularis Lesions in Rats on Delayed Matching and Non-Matching to Position Tasks.

Authors:  Stephen B. Dunnett; Derek C. Rogers; Graham H. Jones
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Role of the cholinergic muscarinic 2 receptor (CHRM2) gene in cognition.

Authors:  D E Comings; S Wu; M Rostamkhani; M McGue; W G Lacono; L S-C Cheng; J P MacMurray
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Both a nicotinic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and a noradrenergic SNP modulate working memory performance when attention is manipulated.

Authors:  Pamela M Greenwood; Ramya Sundararajan; Ming-Kuan Lin; Reshma Kumar; Karl J Fryxell; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  How neuroscience can inform the study of individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.353

2.  Control networks and neuromodulators of early development.

Authors:  Michael I Posner; Mary K Rothbart; Brad E Sheese; Pascale Voelker
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-26

Review 3.  Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Lack of association of a spontaneous mutation of the Chrm2 gene with behavioral and physiologic phenotypic differences in inbred mice.

Authors:  Ming Ding; Jennifer Arnold; Jeremy Turner; Vickram Ramkumar; Larry F Hughes; Rita A Trammell; Linda A Toth
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  CHRM2 Genotype Affects Inhibitory Control Mechanisms During Cognitive Flexibility.

Authors:  Nicolas Zink; Wiebke Bensmann; Larissa Arning; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 6.  Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Neurogenetic effects on cognition in aging brains: a window of opportunity for intervention?

Authors:  Ivar Reinvang; Ian J Deary; Anders M Fjell; Vidar M Steen; Thomas Espeseth; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 8.  The impact of genetic research on our understanding of normal cognitive ageing: 1995 to 2009.

Authors:  Antony Payton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 7.444

9.  Variations in catechol-O-methyltransferase gene interact with parenting to influence attention in early development.

Authors:  P Voelker; B E Sheese; M K Rothbart; M I Posner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms of CD20 gene and their relationship with clinical efficacy of R-CHOP in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Huirong Ding; Xuan Jin; Ning Ding; Zhiying Fu; Yuqin Song; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.