Alan S Herford1. 1. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA. aherford@sd.llu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transport distraction osteogenesis has been used to reconstruct continuity defects by regenerating bone and soft tissues. A challenge has been to maintain the correct vector during the distraction process. A new type of distraction device was recently developed that uses a standard reconstruction plate to "guide" the transported segment of the bone. This plate-guided distractor device (PGD) intimately follows the shape of the plate, thus allowing for 3-dimensional vector control during the distraction process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients underwent transport distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects ranging in size from 4 to 7 cm. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 62 years. Two patients had been treated with radiotherapy as part of treatment for oral malignancy. A standard locking reconstruction plate was placed to bridge the continuity gap. An osteotomy was performed to create a bone transport segment. The PGD was secured to both the reconstruction plate and the transport bone. After a latency period of 7 days, the device was activated at a rate of 1 mm/d. The distraction process continued until the transport segment reached the opposing bone or sufficient bone and soft tissue were reconstructed for oral rehabilitation. RESULTS: All patients achieved hard and soft tissue formation. Two patients had premature consolidation of the distraction regenerate but had sufficient tissue for rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: A PGD can be used to regenerate missing hard and soft tissues. An advantage of this technique is that it uses a reconstruction plate that is routinely placed to bridge mandibular continuity defects. This device allows for ultimate vector control by intimately following a carefully adapted plate.
BACKGROUND: Transport distraction osteogenesis has been used to reconstruct continuity defects by regenerating bone and soft tissues. A challenge has been to maintain the correct vector during the distraction process. A new type of distraction device was recently developed that uses a standard reconstruction plate to "guide" the transported segment of the bone. This plate-guided distractor device (PGD) intimately follows the shape of the plate, thus allowing for 3-dimensional vector control during the distraction process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients underwent transport distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects ranging in size from 4 to 7 cm. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 62 years. Two patients had been treated with radiotherapy as part of treatment for oral malignancy. A standard locking reconstruction plate was placed to bridge the continuity gap. An osteotomy was performed to create a bone transport segment. The PGD was secured to both the reconstruction plate and the transport bone. After a latency period of 7 days, the device was activated at a rate of 1 mm/d. The distraction process continued until the transport segment reached the opposing bone or sufficient bone and soft tissue were reconstructed for oral rehabilitation. RESULTS: All patients achieved hard and soft tissue formation. Two patients had premature consolidation of the distraction regenerate but had sufficient tissue for rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: A PGD can be used to regenerate missing hard and soft tissues. An advantage of this technique is that it uses a reconstruction plate that is routinely placed to bridge mandibular continuity defects. This device allows for ultimate vector control by intimately following a carefully adapted plate.
Authors: Lucy K Nagashima; Michelle Rondon-Newby; Ibrahim E Zakhary; William W Nagy; Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman; Mohammed E Elsalanty Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Elias Kontogiorgos; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Uriel Zapata; Ibrahim Zakhary; William W Nagy; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Madan Nanjappa; M Natashekara; C Sendil Kumar; S V Kumaraswamy; R Keerthi; D P Ashwin; A L Gopinath Journal: J Maxillofac Oral Surg Date: 2011-04-22
Authors: Mohammed E Elsalanty; Ibrahim Zakhary; Sara Akeel; Byron Benson; Timothy Mulone; Gilbert R Triplett; Lynne A Opperman Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.539