Literature DB >> 22110823

Bifocal distraction to regenerate segmental mandibular defects using a custom made device: a report of two cases.

Sriram Krishnan, Ramkumar Subramaniam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Mandibular reconstruction following tumor ablative surgery had been a challenge. It has gone through days of temporary stabilization with k-wire, stainless steel reconstruction plate to avascularized and vascularized bone grafts with varying degree of success and failure. Reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts, though most definitive, requires special expertise, expensive equipment, and long operative time. It also produces donor site morbidity and requires a significant learning curve. With the development of transport distraction techniques there has been a paradigm shift from "reconstructive" to "regenerative" surgery. The objective of this study was to identify the feasibility of an internal device for reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This article is to highlight a process of attempted mandibular regeneration in two cases using an indigenously designed distractor device. In individuals with extensive post ablative mandibular defects who were unwilling to have a secondary surgical site or were medically unfit for a long reconstructive procedure, the distraction technique can be used to reconstruct the lost mandibular structures.
CONCLUSION: A satisfactory amount of regenerate was achieved using a bifocal distraction osteogenesis technique for extensive defects of the mandible. The custom made device which was used for this purpose was moderately satisfactory and requires further evaluation and refinement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Transport distraction; extensive mandibular defects; mandibular reconstruction; single unit distractor device

Year:  2010        PMID: 22110823      PMCID: PMC3052676          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1254382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies.

Authors:  G Swennen; R Dempf; H Schliephake
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Donor site morbidity after microvascular fibula transfer.

Authors:  C E Zimmermann; B I Börner; A Hasse; P Sieg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The principles of the Ilizarov method.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst       Date:  1988

4.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Advantages and limitations of the fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  J Ferri; B Piot; B Ruhin; J Mercier
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Use of a plate-guided distraction device for transport distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  Alan S Herford
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Mandibular reconstruction in 2004: an analysis of different techniques.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; Daniel G Deschler
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.064

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve regeneration by bifocal distraction osteogenesis with retrograde transportation of horseradish peroxidase in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Shogen; Emiko Tanaka Isomura; Mikihiko Kogo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.