Literature DB >> 15083083

Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model.

D R Jordan1, S Brownstein, M Dorey, V Ho Yuen, S Gilberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model and compare it with three other currently available porous implants: Bio-Eye coralline hydroxyapatite (HA), FCI(3) synthetic HA, and aluminum oxide (Bioceramic).
METHODS: The porous polyethylene implant was examined macroscopically and microscopically (with scanning electron microscopy). Implantation was performed in 10 adult male New Zealand albino rabbits. Each animal underwent enucleation of the right globe under general halothane gas anesthesia, followed by placement of a 12-mm porous polyethylene implant. In 5 animals, the implant was encased in polyglactin 910 (Vicryl mesh); in the other 5, it was left unwrapped. The implants were moistened in saline before placement. Implant vascularization was evaluated by histopathology at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks.
RESULTS: The porous polyethylene implant was found to have a smoother exterior surface than the Bio-Eye, FCI(3) synthetic HA, and aluminum oxide implants. Rather than a uniform interconnected porous architecture, there was an extensive system of interconnected channels through the implant, ranging in size from 125 to 1000 microm. On high-power examination there was a more solid, woven appearance without any sign of the microcrystals seen in the other porous implants. One rabbit had a retrobulbar hemorrhage after surgery and was euthanized. All the other rabbits tolerated the implant well, and there were no complications. On histopathologic examination, fibrovascularization gradually increased over time. One implant was completely vascularized at 12 weeks, and both implants harvested at 16 weeks were completely vascularized. The implant harvested at 24 weeks showed only partial vascularization (14%).
CONCLUSIONS: The porous polyethylene orbital implant represents an alternative implant for use after enucleation or evisceration or for secondary implantation. In our rabbit model, the porous polyethylene implant was well tolerated without complication. Complete fibrovascularization was first seen at 12 weeks. Porous polyethylene orbital implants appear to vascularize more slowly than Bio-Eye coralline HA, FCI(3) synthetic HA, and aluminum oxide implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15083083     DOI: 10.1097/01.iop.0000117341.28846.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants.

Authors:  JunHyuk Son; Chang-sik Kim; JaeWook Yang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Porous orbital implants].

Authors:  B Cleres; H W Meyer-Rüsenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Motility and lid changes with coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implants and cryolite glass ocular prostheses].

Authors:  R Thiesmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Long-term results of the compatibility of a coralline hydroxyapatite implant as eye replacement].

Authors:  R Thiesmann; A Anagnostopoulos; B Stemplewitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  The efficacy of acrylic acid grafting and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide immobilization on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene implants in rabbits.

Authors:  Byung Woo Park; Hee Seok Yang; Se Hyun Baek; Kwideok Park; Dong Keun Han; Tae Soo Lee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Ivan Fernandez-Bueno; Salvatore Di Lauro; Ivan Alvarez; Jose Carlos Lopez; Maria Teresa Garcia-Gutierrez; Itziar Fernandez; Eva Larra; Jose Carlos Pastor
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Next-generation finely controlled graded porous antibacterial bioceramics for high-efficiency vascularization in orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Jingyi Wang; Yiyu Peng; Menglu Chen; Xizhe Dai; Lixia Lou; Changjun Wang; Zhaonan Bao; Xianyan Yang; Zhongru Gou; Juan Ye
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-01-02

8.  Copper-Doped Bioactive Glass/Poly (Ether-Ether-Ketone) Composite as an Orbital Enucleation Implant in a Rabbit Model: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Ke Xiong; Mengen Zhao; Zhaoying Wu; Wei Zhang; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.748

9.  Nanoscale Topographical Characterization of Orbital Implant Materials.

Authors:  Marco Salerno; Andrea Reverberi; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.