Literature DB >> 17119998

The efficacy of acrylic acid grafting and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide immobilization on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene implants in rabbits.

Byung Woo Park1, Hee Seok Yang, Se Hyun Baek, Kwideok Park, Dong Keun Han, Tae Soo Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of acrylic acid (AA) grafting by argon plasma treatment and of immobilization of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides on fibrovascular ingrowth rate into high-density porous polyethylene (HPPE) anophthalmic orbital implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty rabbits were divided into three groups, with 20 rabbits in each group: (1) control group, rabbits implanted with unmodified HPPE; (2) PAA group, rabbits implanted with HPPE grafted with poly(AA) by argon plasma treatment; (3) RGD group, rabbits implanted with HPPE grafted with AA by argon plasma treatment and subsequently immobilized with RGD peptide. An HPPE spherical implant was put in the abdominal muscles of rabbit. After implantation for 4 weeks, the retrieved implants were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Blood vessels were counted using CD-31 immunostaining. Cross-sectional areas of fibrovascular ingrowth, blood vessel densities, and host inflammatory response scores were determined for all three groups.
RESULTS: The mean cross-sectional areas of fibrovascularization at 2 and 3 weeks after implantation were the greatest in the RGD group, followed by the PAA group. While minimal fibrovascular ingrowths were noted in all implants at 1 week, all the implants showed nearly complete ingrowth at 4 weeks. Blood vessel densities were the highest in the RGD group, followed by the PAA group at 2, 3, and 4 weeks. The mean inflammation scores of the PAA and RGD groups were less than that of the control group.
CONCLUSION: Fibrovascularization into HPPE implants was enhanced by surface grafting of AA and further improved by immobilizing RGD peptides onto the grafted AA surfaces. The inflammatory reactions were mild by either technique of surface modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119998     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0475-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.535


  40 in total

1.  Fibrovascular ingrowth in porous ocular implants: the effect of material composition, porosity, growth factors, and coatings.

Authors:  W J Bigham; P Stanley; J M Cahill; R W Curran; A C Perry
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  Protein-mediated macrophage adhesion and activation on biomaterials: a model for modulating cell behavior.

Authors:  W J Kao; J A Hubbell; J M Anderson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Complications of porous spherical orbital implants.

Authors:  H D Remulla; P A Rubin; J W Shore; F C Sutula; D J Townsend; J J Woog; K V Jahrling
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Scanning electron microscopic examination of porous orbital implants.

Authors:  L A Mawn; D R Jordan; S Gilberg
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant.

Authors:  J W Karesh; S C Dresner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor).

Authors:  P De Potter; T Duprez; G Cosnard
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Angiogenesis, assessed by platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies, as indicator of node metastases and survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Horak; R Leek; N Klenk; S LeJeune; K Smith; N Stuart; M Greenall; K Stepniewska; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Human endothelial cell interactions with surface-coupled adhesion peptides on a nonadhesive glass substrate and two polymeric biomaterials.

Authors:  S P Massia; J A Hubbell
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-02

9.  Porous polyethylene channel implants: a modified porous polyethylene sheet implant designed for repairs of large and complex orbital wall fractures.

Authors:  J C Choi; J C Fleming; P A Aitken; J W Shore
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants.

Authors:  P A Rubin; J K Popham; J R Bilyk; J W Shore
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.746

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.