Literature DB >> 28160124

[Long-term results of the compatibility of a coralline hydroxyapatite implant as eye replacement].

R Thiesmann1, A Anagnostopoulos2, B Stemplewitz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coralline hydroxyapatite has been used since 1983 as volume replacement. Through 2001, a total of 200 hydroxyapatite implants were used in our department.
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study was undertaken to measure the subjective and objective long-term tolerance of this implant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2012, a total of 20 patients were examined, who were enucleated or eviscerated between 1993 and 2001 (average follow-up 16.2 years) and had an hydroxyapatite implant placed with a scleral sheath. We evaluated the subjective tolerance and measured the motility, the prominence of the globe, lid positions, changes of the conjunctiva and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The subjective long-term tolerance was reported to be good. All patients had a ptosis; an ectropion was found in 50% of patients. In 40% of the patients additional surgery was performed. The motility was better in primary than in secondary placed implants. Volume replacement was successful in 10 patients, 9 patients had a retraction and 1 patient a prominent prosthesis. DISCUSSION: Hydroxyapatite implants with sclera sheathing were well tolerated and showed good motility on long-term follow-up over more than 16 years. Lid malpositions such as ptosis or ectropion are common but might be due to mechanical stress through the prosthesis and atrophy of the orbital fat.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anophthalmus; Compatibility; Hydroxyapatite orbital implant; Long-term results; Motility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28160124     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0444-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  13 in total

1.  The bioceramic orbital implant: a new generation of porous implants.

Authors:  D R Jordan; L A Mawn; S Brownstein; T M McEachren; S M Gilberg; V Hill; S Z Grahovac; J P Adenis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  The Molteno M-Sphere.

Authors:  D R Jordan; I Hwang; S Brownstein; T McEachren; S Gilberg; S Grahovac; L Mawn
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.746

3.  What is the Best Method of Dealing with a Lost Eye?

Authors:  W A Frost
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1887-05-28

4.  Mersilene mesh versus sclera in wrapping hydroxyapatite orbital implants.

Authors:  Abolfazl Kassaee; Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Mohammadreza Panjtanpanah; Ali Sadeghi; Ziaeddin Tabatabaee
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

5.  [Long-term results of implantation of hydroxylapatite as artificial eye].

Authors:  A G Norda; H W Meyer-Rüsenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite orbital implants.

Authors:  D R Jordan; S Chan; L Mawn; S Gilberg; T Dean; S Brownstein; V E Hill
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Baseball orbital implants: a review of 39 patients.

Authors:  A G Tyers; J R Collin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures.

Authors:  David R Jordan; Stephen R Klapper; Steven M Gilberg
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.746

9.  Hydroxyapatite orbital implant vascularization assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephen R Klapper; David R Jordan; Anna Ells; Steven Grahovac
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients.

Authors:  David R Jordan; Steven Gilberg; Ahmed Bawazeer
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.746

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Motility and lid changes with coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implants and cryolite glass ocular prostheses].

Authors:  R Thiesmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Cryolite glass ocular prostheses and coralline hydroxyapatite implants for eye replacement following enucleation].

Authors:  A C Rokohl; K R Koch; M Trester; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.