Literature DB >> 24942122

[Porous orbital implants].

B Cleres1, H W Meyer-Rüsenberg.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first coralline hydroxyapatite porous orbital implant as eye replacement in the early 1980s, numerous other modified porous implants have been developed. Due to the different design of the existing studies concerning long-term safety with, in some cases, relatively short follow-up, a comparison is difficult and none of the implant types can be clearly identified as being superior. Factors affecting the exposure rate of the implant seem to be the implant coating, the surgical technique and the condition of the patient's tissue at the beginning of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942122     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-013-2950-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  54 in total

1.  Mersilene mesh versus sclera in wrapping hydroxyapatite orbital implants.

Authors:  Abolfazl Kassaee; Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Mohammadreza Panjtanpanah; Ali Sadeghi; Ziaeddin Tabatabaee
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  The biologic behavior of hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton.

Authors:  H M Rosen; M M McFarland
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Long-term follow-up of the Allen implant. 1967 to 1991.

Authors:  J T Fan; D M Robertson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials.

Authors:  Pamela Habibovic; Huipin Yuan; Chantal M van der Valk; Gert Meijer; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Klaas de Groot
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants.

Authors:  Paulo Guillinta; Sunil N Vasani; David B Granet; Don O Kikkawa
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.746

6.  The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  L A Cyster; D M Grant; S M Howdle; F R A J Rose; D J Irvine; D Freeman; C A Scotchford; K M Shakesheff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.

Authors:  Grant W Su; Michael T Yen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  Baseball orbital implants: a review of 39 patients.

Authors:  A G Tyers; J R Collin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures.

Authors:  David R Jordan; Stephen R Klapper; Steven M Gilberg
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients.

Authors:  David R Jordan; Steven Gilberg; Ahmed Bawazeer
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.746

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Epithelial ingrowth after evisceration].

Authors:  P L Müller; M C Herwig-Carl; F G Holz; K U Loeffler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  The Evolution of Orbital Implants and Current Breakthroughs in Material Design, Selection, Characterization, and Clinical Use.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Chen; Xue Yang; Xing-Li Fan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Worldwide enucleation techniques and materials for treatment of retinoblastoma: an international survey.

Authors:  Daphne L Mourits; Dyonne T Hartong; Machteld I Bosscha; Roel J H M Kloos; Annette C Moll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.