Literature DB >> 15082572

Intron size correlates positively with recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Anuphap Prachumwat1, Laura DeVincentis, Michael F Palopoli.   

Abstract

A negative correlation between intron size and recombination rate has been reported for the Drosophila melanogaster and human genomes. Population-genetic models suggest that this pattern could be caused by an interaction between recombination rate and the efficacy of natural selection. To test this idea, we examined variation in intron size and recombination rate across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Interestingly, we found that intron size correlated positively with recombination rate in this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082572      PMCID: PMC1470791          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Petrov; E R Lozovskaya; D L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  A survey on intron and exon lengths.

Authors:  J D Hawkins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The evolutionary advantage of recombination.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Why do genes have introns?

Authors:  N J Dibb
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1993-06-28       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The size differences among mammalian introns are due to the accumulation of small deletions.

Authors:  H Ogata; W Fujibuchi; M Kanehisa
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Gwenaël Piganeau
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Extremely short 20-33 nucleotide introns are the standard length in Paramecium tetraurelia.

Authors:  C B Russell; D Fraga; R D Hinrichsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Sergei L Mekhedov; Daniel L Hartl; Eugene V Koonin; Fyodor A Kondrashov
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  T M Barnes; Y Kohara; A Coulson; S Hekimi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  20 in total

1.  A model of genetic search for beneficial mutations: estimating the constructive capacities of mutagenesis.

Authors:  Grigory G Ananko
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A global analysis of C. elegans trans-splicing.

Authors:  Mary Ann Allen; LaDeana W Hillier; Robert H Waterston; Thomas Blumenthal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Broad chromosomal domains of histone modification patterns in C. elegans.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Andreas Rechtsteiner; Thea A Egelhofer; Anne Vielle; Isabel Latorre; Ming-Sin Cheung; Sevinc Ercan; Kohta Ikegami; Morten Jensen; Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz; Heidi Rosenbaum; Hyunjin Shin; Scott Taing; Teruaki Takasaki; A Leonardo Iniguez; Arshad Desai; Abby F Dernburg; Hiroshi Kimura; Jason D Lieb; Julie Ahringer; Susan Strome; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Intron size and exon evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Pierre Nouvellet; Peter D Keightley; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Exceptionally high levels of recombination across the honey bee genome.

Authors:  Martin Beye; Irene Gattermeier; Martin Hasselmann; Tanja Gempe; Morten Schioett; John F Baines; David Schlipalius; Florence Mougel; Christine Emore; Olav Rueppell; Anu Sirviö; Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa; Greg Hunt; Michel Solignac; Robert E Page
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Three independent determinants of protein evolutionary rate.

Authors:  Sun Shim Choi; Sridhar Hannenhalli
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Crassostrea angulata bindin gene and the divergence of fucose-binding lectin repeats among three species of Crassostrea.

Authors:  Qi Wu; Li Li; Guofan Zhang
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Higher frequency of intron loss from the promoter proximally paused genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Xue-Nan Li; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  The putative cyclooctadepsipeptide receptor depsiphilin of the canine hookworm Ancylostoma caninum.

Authors:  Nina Krüger; Achim Harder; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Recombination and its impact on the genome of the haplodiploid parasitoid wasp Nasonia.

Authors:  Oliver Niehuis; Joshua D Gibson; Michael S Rosenberg; Bart A Pannebakker; Tosca Koevoets; Andrea K Judson; Christopher A Desjardins; Kathleen Kennedy; David Duggan; Leo W Beukeboom; Louis van de Zande; David M Shuker; John H Werren; Jürgen Gadau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.