Literature DB >> 23400388

Three independent determinants of protein evolutionary rate.

Sun Shim Choi1, Sridhar Hannenhalli.   

Abstract

One of the most widely accepted ideas related to the evolutionary rates of proteins is that functionally important residues or regions evolve slower than other regions, a reasonable outcome of which should be a slower evolutionary rate of the proteins with a higher density of functionally important sites. Oddly, the role of functional importance, mainly measured by essentiality, in determining evolutionary rate has been challenged in recent studies. Several variables other than protein essentiality, such as expression level, gene compactness, protein-protein interactions, etc., have been suggested to affect protein evolutionary rate. In the present review, we try to refine the concept of functional importance of a gene, and consider three factors-functional importance, expression level, and gene compactness, as independent determinants of evolutionary rate of a protein, based not only on their known correlation with evolutionary rate but also on a reasonable mechanistic model. We suggest a framework based on these mechanistic models to correctly interpret the correlations between evolutionary rates and the various variables as well as the interrelationships among the variables.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400388     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-013-9543-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  157 in total

1.  Human housekeeping genes are compact.

Authors:  Eli Eisenberg; Erez Y Levanon
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Understanding relationship between sequence and functional evolution in yeast proteins.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kim; Soojin V Yi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  Evolutionary systems biology: links between gene evolution and function.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Yuri I Wolf
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 4.  Translational selection and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Evolutionary conservation of essential and highly expressed genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Andreas Dötsch; Frank Klawonn; Michael Jarek; Maren Scharfe; Helmut Blöcker; Susanne Häussler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus.

Authors:  You S Rao; Zhang F Wang; Xue W Chai; Guo Z Wu; Ming Zhou; Qing H Nie; Xi Q Zhang
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Genome factor and gene pleiotropy hypotheses in protein evolution.

Authors:  Yanwu Zeng; Xun Gu
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.540

9.  Why is the correlation between gene importance and gene evolutionary rate so weak?

Authors:  Zhi Wang; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Protein protein interactions, evolutionary rate, abundance and age.

Authors:  Ramazan Saeed; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Rapid bursts and slow declines: on the possible evolutionary trajectories of enzymes.

Authors:  Matilda S Newton; Vickery L Arcus; Wayne M Patrick
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Molecular Evolutionary Constraints that Determine the Avirulence State of Clostridium botulinum C2 Toxin.

Authors:  A Prisilla; R Prathiviraj; P Chellapandi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Highly variable recombinational landscape modulates efficacy of natural selection in birds.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Anna W Santure; Ben C Sheldon; Jon Slate; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Population transcriptomics uncovers the regulation of gene expression variation in adaptation to changing environment.

Authors:  Qin Xu; Caiyun Zhu; Yangyang Fan; Zhihong Song; Shilai Xing; Wei Liu; Juan Yan; Tao Sang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The organelle of differentiation in embryos: the cell state splitter.

Authors:  Natalie K Gordon; Richard Gordon
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.432

6.  ERK1 and ERK2 present functional redundancy in tetrapods despite higher evolution rate of ERK1.

Authors:  Roser Buscà; Richard Christen; Matthew Lovern; Alexander M Clifford; Jia-Xing Yue; Greg G Goss; Jacques Pouysségur; Philippe Lenormand
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Determinants of expression variability.

Authors:  Elfalem Y Alemu; Joseph W Carl; Héctor Corrada Bravo; Sridhar Hannenhalli
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Sequence divergence and diversity suggests ongoing functional diversification of vertebrate NAD metabolism.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Mathias Ziegler
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-07-29

9.  Essentiality Is a Strong Determinant of Protein Rates of Evolution during Mutation Accumulation Experiments in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  David Alvarez-Ponce; Beatriz Sabater-Muñoz; Christina Toft; Mario X Ruiz-González; Mario A Fares
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Correlates of evolutionary rates in the murine sperm proteome.

Authors:  Julia Schumacher; Holger Herlyn
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.