Literature DB >> 8706839

The size differences among mammalian introns are due to the accumulation of small deletions.

H Ogata1, W Fujibuchi, M Kanehisa.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the molecular mechanisms that alter intron size, we conducted an extensive interspecies comparison of homologous introns among three mammalian groups: human, artiodactyls, and rodents. The size differences of introns were statistically significant among all three groups (longest intron was for human and shortest for rodents), and appear to be due to the accumulation of small deletions, according to the separate count of insertion and deletion frequencies. The distribution of intron size differences also has a shape similar to that for the distribution of insertion/deletion sizes found in pseudogenes. It is suggested that introns are selectively neutral to small-scale changes of the genome size, which inherently contain the bias of favoring short deletions against short insertions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8706839     DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00636-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


  11 in total

1.  Intron size correlates positively with recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Anuphap Prachumwat; Laura DeVincentis; Michael F Palopoli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  A guided tour of large genome size in animals: what we know and where we are heading.

Authors:  France Dufresne; Nicholas Jeffery
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Comparative evolutionary rates of introns and exons in murine rodents.

Authors:  A L Hughes; M Yeager
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.

Authors:  J M Comeron; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic regionality in rates of evolution is not explained by clustering of genes of comparable expression profile.

Authors:  Martin J Lercher; Jean-Vincent Chamary; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Selective and mutational patterns associated with gene expression in humans: influences on synonymous composition and intron presence.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution.

Authors:  Ross C Hardison; Krishna M Roskin; Shan Yang; Mark Diekhans; W James Kent; Ryan Weber; Laura Elnitski; Jia Li; Michael O'Connor; Diana Kolbe; Scott Schwartz; Terrence S Furey; Simon Whelan; Nick Goldman; Arian Smit; Webb Miller; Francesca Chiaromonte; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Genome size evolution in pufferfish: an insight from BAC clone-based Diodon holocanthus genome sequencing.

Authors:  Baocheng Guo; Ming Zou; Xiaoni Gan; Shunping He
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Unravelling the genome of Holy basil: an "incomparable" "elixir of life" of traditional Indian medicine.

Authors:  Shubhra Rastogi; Alok Kalra; Vikrant Gupta; Feroz Khan; Raj Kishori Lal; Anil Kumar Tripathi; Sriram Parameswaran; Chellappa Gopalakrishnan; Gopalakrishna Ramaswamy; Ajit Kumar Shasany
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Modeling one thousand intron length distributions with fitild.

Authors:  Osamu Gotoh
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.