Literature DB >> 15074364

The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation.

Marie-José Durand1, Patrick Loisel, Stéphane Poitras, Richard Mercier, Susan R Stock, Jacques Lemaire.   

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the interrater reliability of the Dynamic Strength, Position Tolerance, and Mobility tasks of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation (PWPE), a Functional Capacity Evaluation often used with workers disabled due to back pain. For each worker's evaluation, two raters were preselected among five trained raters. One of the raters administered the PWPE while the other functioned as a silent rater. A convenience sample of 40 workers disabled due to back pain and referred to an occupational rehabilitation center was used. In general, the reliability was "substantial" (0.61 < or = kappa < or = 0.80) to "almost perfect" (0.81 < or = kappa < or = 1.00) for most of the 21 tasks and three sections of the PWPE evaluated with the exception of three tasks in the Mobility section (ladder climbing (kappa = 0.47), repetitive trunk rotation--standing (kappa = 0.54), and repetitive trunk rotation--sitting (kappa = 0.37)) task and the Mobility section itself (kappa = 0.54). Several reasons could explain the lower agreement on the observation of the physical signs associated with these tasks. Since these tasks involve rotation movements or complex neuromuscular integration, it seemed difficult for the raters to define what are the normal physical signs and when physical signs of maximal functional capacity are present. The criteria for establishing the presence of the physical signs in the PWPE should be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15074364     DOI: 10.1023/b:joor.0000018328.35521.e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  19 in total

1.  Validity of work-related assessments.

Authors:  Ev Innes; Leon Straker
Journal:  Work       Date:  1999

Review 2.  The functional capacity evaluation: measuring maximal work abilities.

Authors:  A K Tramposh
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar

3.  Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims.

Authors:  L Hashemi; B S Webster; E A Clancy; E Volinn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 4.  The independent medical examination and the functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  J Kraus
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep

5.  A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 1 - purposes and problems.

Authors:  E Innes; L Straker
Journal:  Work       Date:  1998

6.  Swedish use and validation of Valpar work samples for patients with musculoskeletal neck and shoulder pain.

Authors:  M L Schult; I Söderback; K Jacobs
Journal:  Work       Date:  1995

7.  A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 1--Development and reliability testing.

Authors:  L N Matheson; V Mooney; J E Grant; M Affleck; H Hall; T Melles; R L Lichter; G McIntosh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; E Abdel-Moty; R Cutler; T M Khalil; S Sadek; R S Rosomoff; H L Rosomoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A critical review of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  P M King; N Tuckwell; T E Barrett
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08

10.  Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance.

Authors:  D E Lechner; J R Jackson; D L Roth; K V Straaton
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1994-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Health professional's perceptions and practices in relation to functional capacity evaluations: results of a quantitative survey.

Authors:  Carole James; Lynette Mackenzie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-14

2.  Updating the Evidence on Functional Capacity Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stijn De Baets; Patrick Calders; Noortje Schalley; Katrien Vermeulen; Sofie Vertriest; Lien Van Peteghem; Marieke Coussens; Fransiska Malfait; Guy Vanderstraeten; Geert Van Hove; Dominique Van de Velde
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

3.  Readiness for change predicts outcomes of functional rehabilitation following motor vehicle accident.

Authors:  Gregg A Tkachuk; John K Marshall; Annalyn C Mercado; Bruce McMurtry; Fern Stockdale-Winder
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

4.  Responsiveness of the physical work performance evaluation, a functional capacity evaluation, in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Bruno Brassard; Quan Nha Hong; Jacques Lemaire; Patrick Loisel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-01-04

5.  Does category of strength predict return-to-work after occupational injury?

Authors:  Chia-Lin Yang; Yan-Ru Yin; Chuan-Man Chu; Pei-Ling Tang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  M A Trippolini; P U Dijkstra; B Jansen; P Oesch; J H B Geertzen; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.