BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Physical Work Performance Evaluation (PWPE) is a functional capacity evaluation. This study investigated the responsiveness of the PWPE. METHODS: The internal and external responsiveness was tested. For the internal responsiveness, the change in the pre-/post-test PWPE scores of a group participating in a work rehabilitation program (n = 27) was compared to that of a comparison group of healthy subjects (n = 30). The external responsiveness was tested with the rehabilitation group, and the change in their PWPE scores was compared to concurrent and empirical criteria. RESULTS: The comparison of the change in pre-/post-test PWPE scores showed that the change for the rehabilitation group was significantly different from that for the comparison group, but only for one section of the PWPE. Changes in six criteria were seen after completion of the program, but there was no significant correlation between these changes and the change in the overall PWPE score. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The overall PWPE level of work score does not appear to have the ability to measure clinically significant changes achieved through a work rehabilitation program.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Physical Work Performance Evaluation (PWPE) is a functional capacity evaluation. This study investigated the responsiveness of the PWPE. METHODS: The internal and external responsiveness was tested. For the internal responsiveness, the change in the pre-/post-test PWPE scores of a group participating in a work rehabilitation program (n = 27) was compared to that of a comparison group of healthy subjects (n = 30). The external responsiveness was tested with the rehabilitation group, and the change in their PWPE scores was compared to concurrent and empirical criteria. RESULTS: The comparison of the change in pre-/post-test PWPE scores showed that the change for the rehabilitation group was significantly different from that for the comparison group, but only for one section of the PWPE. Changes in six criteria were seen after completion of the program, but there was no significant correlation between these changes and the change in the overall PWPE score. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The overall PWPE level of work score does not appear to have the ability to measure clinically significant changes achieved through a work rehabilitation program.
Authors: Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Isabelle Larocque Journal: CMAJ Date: 2005-06-07 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: P Loisel; L Abenhaim; P Durand; J M Esdaile; S Suissa; L Gosselin; R Simard; J Turcotte; J Lemaire Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1997-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Stijn De Baets; Patrick Calders; Noortje Schalley; Katrien Vermeulen; Sofie Vertriest; Lien Van Peteghem; Marieke Coussens; Fransiska Malfait; Guy Vanderstraeten; Geert Van Hove; Dominique Van de Velde Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2018-09
Authors: Monika E Finger; Andrea Glässel; Peter Erhart; Felix Gradinger; Andreas Klipstein; Gilles Rivier; Maria Schröer; Christian Wenk; Hans Peter Gmünder; Gerold Stucki; Reuben Escorpizo Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2011-06