Literature DB >> 8588169

A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 1--Development and reliability testing.

L N Matheson1, V Mooney, J E Grant, M Affleck, H Hall, T Melles, R L Lichter, G McIntosh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Two laboratory studies and one field study evaluated the safety and test-retest reliability of a new test of lift capacity. The first two studies were conducted in a carefully controlled laboratory setting. The first study investigated the safety and intra-rater reliability of the EPIC Lift Capacity test protocol with healthy adult subjects. The second study assessed the safety and inter-rater reliability of the test with disabled subjects. The third study was conducted in the field with 65 evaluators and investigated the safety and intra-rater reliability of the test with healthy adult subjects.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and reliability of a new test of lift capacity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A new test of lift capacity has been developed. Test development occurred within the context of ergonomic standards and guide-lines of the major professional associations and public agencies that govern test development in the United States.
METHODS: In study no. 1, 26 healthy subjects participated. In study no. 2, 14 disabled subjects participated. In study no. 3, 318 healthy subjects participated. After subjects underwent basic screening and warm-up, the EPIC Lift Capacity test was administered. One to 2 weeks later, the test was administered again. Correlations between the times of testing were calculated.
RESULTS: No subjects were injured. Hamstring soreness the next day that resolved without complication was reported by some healthy subjects. None of the disabled subjects reported new symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The safety and reliability of the EPIC Lift Capacity test was adequately demonstrated in a laboratory setting and across multiple field sites with evaluators who have varying types and degrees of professional preparation.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588169     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Upper lifting performance of healthy young adults in functional capacity evaluations: a comparison of two protocols.

Authors:  S IJmker; E H Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 3.  Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

4.  The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel; Stéphane Poitras; Richard Mercier; Susan R Stock; Jacques Lemaire
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

5.  Reliability and validity of a new computer-administered pictorial activity and task sort.

Authors:  John Mayer; Vert Mooney; Leonard Matheson; Scott Leggett; Joe Verna; Greg Balourdas; Greg DeFilippo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

Review 6.  Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

7.  Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wietske Kuijer; Sandra Brouwer; H R Schiphorst Preuper; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-06

8.  Relationships among age, body weight, resting heart rate, and performance in a new test of lift capacity.

Authors:  L N Matheson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-12

9.  Feature Detection and Biomechanical Analysis to Objectively Identify High Exposure Movement Strategies When Performing the EPIC Lift Capacity test.

Authors:  Daniel P Armstrong; Aleksandra R Budarick; Claragh E E Pegg; Ryan B Graham; Steven L Fischer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

10.  Safety issues in functional capacity evaluation: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Libby Gibson; Jenny Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.