Literature DB >> 15071002

Practical strategies for performance optimization of the enhanced gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test.

A Sloutsky1, L L Han, B G Werner.   

Abstract

The enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) test was evaluated using a combined set of 338 acid-fast smear-positive and smear-negative, respiratory and nonrespiratory clinical specimens received by the Massachusetts State Tuberculosis Laboratory from September 1999 through March 2002. Microbiological culture was used as the reference method; therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of the MTD test were calculated for culture-positive specimens only. The initial assessment indicated that the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MTD test for all specimens grouped together were 62, 98, 99, and 68%, respectively. A detailed discrepancy analysis revealed that two major factors causing negative MTD results in specimens that were culture positive for M. tuberculosis complex were patient treatment with antituberculosis drugs prior to testing and the presence of inhibitory substances in the specimen. Based on these findings, a protocol for optimizing MTD test performance in this setting is proposed in which (i) specimens from patients taking antituberculosis medications are excluded from testing and (ii) all initially MTD-negative or MTD-equivocal specimens are subjected to testing for inhibitors. If this strategy was followed, the MTD test sensitivity would be at least 91%, a significant improvement over the initial sensitivity of 62%. Accordingly, the negative predictive value would increase from 68 to 91%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071002      PMCID: PMC387570          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1547-1551.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Clinical Evaluation of the Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in select nonrespiratory specimens.

Authors:  G L Woods; J S Bergmann; N Williams-Bouyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Routine use of the Gen-Probe MTD2 amplification test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens in a large public health mycobacteriology laboratory.

Authors:  P Chedore; F B Jamieson
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Clinical evaluation of the enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in prison inmates.

Authors:  J S Bergmann; G Yuoh; G Fish; G L Woods
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test by using respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens in a tertiary care center laboratory.

Authors:  Cathal E O'Sullivan; David R Miller; Peggy S Schneider; Glenn D Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Update: Nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Comparative evaluation of initial and new versions of the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens.

Authors:  F Gamboa; G Fernandez; E Padilla; J M Manterola; J Lonca; P J Cardona; L Matas; V Ausina
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comprehensive evaluation of performance, laboratory application, and clinical usefulness of two direct amplification technologies for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

Authors:  P Della-Latta; S Whittier
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  False-positive Gen-Probe direct Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplification test results for patients with pulmonary M. kansasii and M. avium infections.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J R Salinas; R Paxson; K Magnon; J E Patterson; T F Patterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparative evaluation of the new gen-probe Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplified direct test and the semiautomated abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens.

Authors:  C Piersimoni; A Callegaro; C Scarparo; V Penati; D Nista; S Bornigia; C Lacchini; M Scagnelli; G Santini; G De Sio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Specimen dilution improves sensitivity of the amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for smear microscopy-positive respiratory specimens.

Authors:  Renata L Guerra; James F Baker; Roya Alborz; Derek T Armstrong; Julia A Kiehlbauch; Marcus B Conde; Susan E Dorman; Nancy M Hooper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  False-negative results obtained with the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test caused by unrecognized inhibition of the amplification reaction.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Mary Jane Ferraro; John A Branda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct testing for cases of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Renata L Guerra; Nancy M Hooper; James F Baker; Roya Alborz; Derek T Armstrong; Julia A Kiehlbauch; Marcus B Conde; Susan E Dorman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical evaluation of TRCRapid M.TB for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens.

Authors:  Haruka Tanaka; Haruka Hirose; Yuko Kato; Saori Kida; Eiji Miyajima
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Identification of Mycobacterium species by secA1 sequences.

Authors:  Adrian M Zelazny; Leslie B Calhoun; Li Li; Yvonne R Shea; Steven H Fischer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  PCR colorimetric dot-blot assay and clinical pretest probability for diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in smear-negative patients.

Authors:  Luciene Cardoso Scherer; Rosa Dea Sperhacke; Carla Jarczewski; Patrícia I Cafrune; Simone Minghelli; Marta Osório Ribeiro; Fernanda Cq Mello; Antonio Ruffino-Netto; Maria Lr Rossetti; Afrânio L Kritski
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Recent advances in diagnostic microbiology.

Authors:  Lulette Tricia C Bravo; Gary W Procop
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.851

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.