Literature DB >> 9817880

Comparative evaluation of the new gen-probe Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplified direct test and the semiautomated abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens.

C Piersimoni1, A Callegaro, C Scarparo, V Penati, D Nista, S Bornigia, C Lacchini, M Scagnelli, G Santini, G De Sio.   

Abstract

Two commercial assays that detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) in clinical specimens by rRNA target amplification (AMTDII) and ligase chain reaction (LCx) were evaluated. The tests were applied to 457 respiratory (n = 273) and extrapulmonary (n = 184) specimens collected from 357 patients. The results were compared with those of acid-fast staining and culture. The combination of culture and clinical diagnosis was considered to be the "gold standard." Seventy specimens were from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and 28 specimens were from patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis. After resolution of discrepant results, the overall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for respiratory specimens were 92.8, 99.4, 98.5, and 97%, respectively, for AMTDII and 75.7, 98.8, 96.4, and 90.5%, respectively, for LCx. With extrapulmonary specimens, the overall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were 78.6, 99.3, 95.6, and 96.2%, respectively, for AMTDII and 53.6, 99.3, 93.7, and 92.1%, respectively, for LCx. The level of agreement between AMTDII and LCx assay results was 78.2%. We conclude that although both nucleic acid amplification methods are rapid and specific for the detection of MTB in clinical specimens, AMTDII is significantly more sensitive than LCx with both respiratory (P = 0.005) and extrapulmonary (P = 0.048) specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9817880      PMCID: PMC105247     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of a commercial ligase chain reaction kit (Abbott LCx) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens.

Authors:  E Tortoli; F Lavinia; M T Simonetti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct detection test.

Authors:  M R Fairfax
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 3.  Mycobacteriology laboratory.

Authors:  L Heifets
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.878

4.  Comparison of the amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) direct test, Amplicor MTB PCR, and IS6110-PCR for detection of MTB in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  J R Dalovisio; S Montenegro-James; S A Kemmerly; C F Genre; R Chambers; D Greer; G A Pankey; D M Failla; K G Haydel; L Hutchinson; M F Lindley; B M Nunez; A Praba; K D Eisenach; E S Cooper
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Evaluation of the semiautomated Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  V Ausina; F Gamboa; E Gazapo; J M Manterola; J Lonca; L Matas; J R Manzano; C Rodrigo; P J Cardona; E Padilla
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of two automated DNA amplification systems with a manual one-tube nested PCR assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  K Y Yuen; W C Yam; L P Wong; W H Seto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  D F Moore; J I Curry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparative evaluation of initial and new versions of the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens.

Authors:  F Gamboa; G Fernandez; E Padilla; J M Manterola; J Lonca; P J Cardona; L Matas; V Ausina
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples from patients in Norway by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Lindbråthen; P Gaustad; B Hovig; T Tønjum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Diagnostic performance of amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test with cerebrospinal fluid, other nonrespiratory, and respiratory specimens.

Authors:  G E Pfyffer; P Kissling; E M Jahn; H M Welscher; M Salfinger; R Weber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  23 in total

1.  Comparison of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis.

Authors:  D J Dawson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Modern laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections.

Authors:  S A Watterson; F A Drobniewski
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gianna Mazzarelli; Laura Rindi; Paola Piccoli; Claudio Scarparo; Carlo Garzelli; Enrico Tortoli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples.

Authors:  Claudio Piersimoni; Claudio Scarparo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the real-time PCR method and the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and nonpulmonary specimens.

Authors:  Nadine Lemaître; Sylvie Armand; Anne Vachée; Odile Capilliez; Christine Dumoulin; René J Courcol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Current evidence on diagnostic accuracy of commercially based nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Greco; E Girardi; A Navarra; C Saltini
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  False-negative results obtained with the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test caused by unrecognized inhibition of the amplification reaction.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Mary Jane Ferraro; John A Branda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of GenoType mycobacteria direct assay in comparison with Gen-Probe Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplified direct test and GenoType MTBDRplus for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples.

Authors:  Ioannis K Neonakis; Zoe Gitti; Stavroula Baritaki; Efi Petinaki; Maria Baritaki; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Practical strategies for performance optimization of the enhanced gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test.

Authors:  A Sloutsky; L L Han; B G Werner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Improved sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.

Authors:  Isik Somuncu Johansen; Bettina Lundgren; Fehmi Tabak; Björn Petrini; Salih Hosoglu; Nese Saltoglu; Vibeke Østergaard Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.