Literature DB >> 11980950

Evaluation of Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test by using respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens in a tertiary care center laboratory.

Cathal E O'Sullivan1, David R Miller, Peggy S Schneider, Glenn D Roberts.   

Abstract

The performance of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (AMTD) test (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, Calif.) was assessed in a large tertiary care mycobacteriology laboratory. Both acid-fast smear-positive and smear-negative respiratory and nonrespiratory clinical specimens were analyzed. From February 1998 to 4 October 2001, AMTD assays were performed on 391 respiratory specimens and 164 nonrespiratory specimens. The AMTD assay was compared to the "gold standard" of combined culture and clinical diagnosis. The overall sensitivity for all specimens, including those for which no smear result was available, was 91.2%. The overall sensitivities of the assay, including acid-fast smear-positive and -negative specimens, were 97.8 and 77.3% for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens, respectively. The corresponding specificities for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens were 99.1 and 98.5%, respectively. The overall specificity for all specimens was 98.9%. Positive and negative predictive values were 93.9 and 99.7% and 91.7 and 96.4% for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens, respectively. The time saved by using the AMTD test for making a diagnosis of tuberculosis instead of using culture was 8.99 days. Inhibitors to the AMTD assay were found in 3.1% of respiratory specimens and 3.1% of nonrespiratory specimens. The assay, used in a general mycobacteriology laboratory setting, represents an important advance in improving the speed and accuracy of diagnosis in the management of patients with tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11980950      PMCID: PMC130650          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1723-1727.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Driving a stake into resurgent TB.

Authors:  M Enserink
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Routine use of the Gen-Probe MTD2 amplification test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens in a large public health mycobacteriology laboratory.

Authors:  P Chedore; F B Jamieson
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Comparison of enhanced Mycobacterium tuberculosis amplified direct test with COBAS AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens.

Authors:  C Scarparo; P Piccoli; A Rigon; G Ruggiero; M Scagnelli; C Piersimoni
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the upgraded amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test (gen-probe) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and non-respiratory specimens.

Authors:  L Alcalá; M J Ruiz-Serrano; S Hernangómez; M Marín; D García de Viedma; R San Juan; E Bouza
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Comparative evaluation of two commercial amplification assays for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  C Piersimoni; A Callegaro; D Nista; S Bornigia; F De Conti; G Santini; G De Sio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in nonrespiratory specimens by Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test.

Authors:  F Gamboa; J M Manterola; B Viñado; L Matas; M Giménez; J Lonca; J R Manzano; C Rodrigo; P J Cardona; E Padilla; J Domínguez; V Ausina
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Update: Nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Comparative evaluation of initial and new versions of the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens.

Authors:  F Gamboa; G Fernandez; E Padilla; J M Manterola; J Lonca; P J Cardona; L Matas; V Ausina
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Diagnostic performance of amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test with cerebrospinal fluid, other nonrespiratory, and respiratory specimens.

Authors:  G E Pfyffer; P Kissling; E M Jahn; H M Welscher; M Salfinger; R Weber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Factors affecting the clinical value of microscopy for acid-fast bacilli.

Authors:  B A Lipsky; J Gates; F C Tenover; J J Plorde
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr
View more
  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gianna Mazzarelli; Laura Rindi; Paola Piccoli; Claudio Scarparo; Carlo Garzelli; Enrico Tortoli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples.

Authors:  Claudio Piersimoni; Claudio Scarparo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the real-time PCR method and the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and nonpulmonary specimens.

Authors:  Nadine Lemaître; Sylvie Armand; Anne Vachée; Odile Capilliez; Christine Dumoulin; René J Courcol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current evidence on diagnostic accuracy of commercially based nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Greco; E Girardi; A Navarra; C Saltini
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Automated extraction and amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in various clinical samples.

Authors:  Christine Simonnet; Vincent Lacoste; Anne Sophie Drogoul; Nalin Rastogi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infection.

Authors:  Shu-Hua Wang; Preeti Pancholi
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Practical strategies for performance optimization of the enhanced gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test.

Authors:  A Sloutsky; L L Han; B G Werner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Magnetic barcode assay for genetic detection of pathogens.

Authors:  Monty Liong; Anh N Hoang; Jaehoon Chung; Nil Gural; Christopher B Ford; Changwook Min; Rupal R Shah; Rushdy Ahmad; Marta Fernandez-Suarez; Sarah M Fortune; Mehmet Toner; Hakho Lee; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Performance assessment of a nested-PCR assay (the RAPID BAP-MTB) and the BD ProbeTec ET system for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  Jann-Yuan Wang; Li-Na Lee; Chin-Sheng Chou; Chung-Yi Huang; Shu-Kuan Wang; Hsin-Chih Lai; Po-Ren Hsueh; Kwen-Tay Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Performance assessment of the DR. MTBC Screen assay and the BD ProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  Jann-Yuan Wang; Li-Na Lee; Hsiao-Leng Hsu; Po-Ren Hsueh; Kwen-Tay Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.