Literature DB >> 15066778

Relative ability of orally administered Lactobacillus murinus to predominate and persist in the porcine gastrointestinal tract.

Gillian E Gardiner1, Pat G Casey, Garrett Casey, P Brendan Lynch, Peadar G Lawlor, Colin Hill, Gerald F Fitzgerald, Catherine Stanton, R Paul Ross.   

Abstract

Five porcine-derived Lactobacillus or Pediococcus isolates administered to pigs (n = 4), either singly or as a combination at approximately 10(10) CFU per day varied with respect to intestinal survival and persistence. Two Lactobacillus murinus strains survived best and were excreted at approximately 10(7) to 10(8) CFU/g of feces. In contrast, Pediococcus pentosaceus DPC6006 had the lowest fecal count at approximately 10(5) CFU/g and was excreted at a significantly lower level than both L. murinus strains. Fecal L. murinus DPC6003 counts were also significantly higher than both Lactobacillus salivarius DPC6005 and Lactobacillus pentosus DPC6004 ( approximately 10(6) CFU/g). The L. murinus strains persisted for at least 9 days postadministration in both the feces and the cecum. Animals fed a combination of all five strains excreted approximately 10(7) CFU of the administered strains/g, with L. murinus predominating, as determined by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA PCR. Postadministration, variation was observed between animals fed the strain combination, but in general, L. murinus DPC6002 and DPC6003 and L. pentosus DPC6004 predominated in the feces and the cecum while P. pentosaceus DPC6006 was detected only in the cecum. Fifteen days after the start of culture administration, mean fecal Enterobacteriaceae counts were significantly lower in some of the treatment groups. In addition, when mean preadministration counts were compared with those obtained after 21 days of culture administration, Enterobacteriaceae counts were reduced by approximately 87 to 98% in pigs fed L. salivarius DPC6005, P. pentosaceus DPC6006, L. pentosus DPC6004, and the culture mix. In conclusion, the porcine intestinal isolates have potential as probiotic feed additives for pigs, with differences in strain performance highlighting the advantages of using culture combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15066778      PMCID: PMC383152          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.1895-1906.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Surveys for salmonella in pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter in Great Britain.

Authors:  R Davies; G Paiba; S Evans; B Dalziel
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2000-12-09       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Microbiologic evaluation of commercial probiotics.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Selection of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus strain and subsequent in vivo studies.

Authors:  Y H Chang; J K Kim; H J Kim; W Y Kim; Y B Kim; Y H Park
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 4.  In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings.

Authors:  C Dunne; L O'Mahony; L Murphy; G Thornton; D Morrissey; S O'Halloran; M Feeney; S Flynn; G Fitzgerald; C Daly; B Kiely; G C O'Sullivan; F Shanahan; J K Collins
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures.

Authors:  L Z Jin; Y W Ho; N Abdullah; S Jalaludin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Colonization of the porcine gastrointestinal tract by lactobacilli.

Authors:  K Pedersen; G W Tannock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Study of the effect of Lactobacillus paracasei and fructooligosaccharides on the faecal microflora in weanling piglets.

Authors:  R Nemcová; A Bomba; S Gancarciková; R Herich; P Guba
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1999 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 0.328

8.  Significance of fecal volatile fatty acids in shedding of Escherichia coli O157 from calves: experimental infection and preliminary use of a probiotic product.

Authors:  T Ohya; T Marubashi; H Ito
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.267

9.  Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human healt.

Authors:  M D Barton
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.800

10.  Lactobacillus cells in the rabbit digestive tract and the factors affecting their distribution.

Authors:  B Yu; H Y Tsen
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-09
View more
  22 in total

1.  Detection and Specific Enumeration of Multi-Strain Probiotics in the Lumen Contents and Mucus Layers of the Rat Intestine After Oral Administration.

Authors:  Hee Ji Lee; David A Orlovich; John R Tagg; J Paul Fawcett
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Evidence-based guidelines for use of probiotics in preterm neonates.

Authors:  Girish C Deshpande; Shripada C Rao; Anthony D Keil; Sanjay K Patole
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  High-throughput sequence-based analysis of the intestinal microbiota of weanling pigs fed genetically modified MON810 maize expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab (Bt maize) for 31 days.

Authors:  Stefan G Buzoianu; Maria C Walsh; Mary C Rea; Orla O'Sullivan; Paul D Cotter; R Paul Ross; Gillian E Gardiner; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  A five-strain probiotic combination reduces pathogen shedding and alleviates disease signs in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Pat G Casey; Gillian E Gardiner; Garrett Casey; Bernard Bradshaw; Peadar G Lawlor; P Brendan Lynch; Finola C Leonard; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Colin Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Lactobacillus strain ecology and persistence within broiler chickens fed different diets: identification of persistent strains.

Authors:  David P Stephenson; Robert J Moore; Gwen E Allison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Sequence-based analysis of the intestinal Microbiota of sows and their offspring fed genetically modified maize expressing a truncated form of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protein (Bt Maize).

Authors:  Stefan G Buzoianu; Maria C Walsh; Mary C Rea; Lisa Quigley; Orla O'Sullivan; Paul D Cotter; R Paul Ross; Gillian E Gardiner; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Salivaricin P, one of a family of two-component antilisterial bacteriocins produced by intestinal isolates of Lactobacillus salivarius.

Authors:  Eoin Barrett; Maria Hayes; Paula O'Connor; Gillian Gardiner; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effects of lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 on pig growth and pork quality.

Authors:  Cheng Suo; Yeshi Yin; Xiaona Wang; Xiuyu Lou; Dafeng Song; Xin Wang; Qing Gu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Probiotic bacteria influence the composition and function of the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Paul W O'Toole; Jakki C Cooney
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-03

10.  Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience.

Authors:  Ashley Shade; Hannes Peter; Steven D Allison; Didier L Baho; Mercè Berga; Helmut Bürgmann; David H Huber; Silke Langenheder; Jay T Lennon; Jennifer B H Martiny; Kristin L Matulich; Thomas M Schmidt; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.