Literature DB >> 17261517

A five-strain probiotic combination reduces pathogen shedding and alleviates disease signs in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.

Pat G Casey1, Gillian E Gardiner, Garrett Casey, Bernard Bradshaw, Peadar G Lawlor, P Brendan Lynch, Finola C Leonard, Catherine Stanton, R Paul Ross, Gerald F Fitzgerald, Colin Hill.   

Abstract

Salmonella spp. infection is a major cause of gastroenteritis, with many thousands of cases reported in the European Union every year. The use of probiotics offers the potential to improve this situation. Here, we investigate the effects of oral treatment of pigs with a defined lactic acid bacteria culture mixture on both clinical and microbiological signs of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Fifteen weaned pigs blocked by sex and weight were administered control milk or a mixture of five probiotic strains as either a milk fermentate or milk suspension for a total of 30 days. The mixture consisted of two strains of Lactobacillus murinus and one strain each of Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius, Lactobacillus pentosus, and Pediococcus pentosaceous. Following probiotic administration for 6 days, animals were challenged orally with serovar Typhimurium; the health of the animals and the microbiological composition of their feces were monitored for 23 days postinfection. Animals treated with probiotic showed reduced incidence, severity, and duration of diarrhea. These animals also gained weight at a greater rate than control pigs administered skim milk. Mean fecal numbers of Salmonella were significantly reduced in probiotic-treated animals at 15 days postinfection (P = 0.01). The administered probiotic bacteria improved both the clinical and microbiological outcome of Salmonella infection. These strains offer significant benefit for use in the food industry and may have potential in human applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17261517      PMCID: PMC1828830          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01840-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Surveys for salmonella in pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter in Great Britain.

Authors:  R Davies; G Paiba; S Evans; B Dalziel
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2000-12-09       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Selection of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus strain and subsequent in vivo studies.

Authors:  Y H Chang; J K Kim; H J Kim; W Y Kim; Y B Kim; Y H Park
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Rapid infection in market-weight swine following exposure to a Salmonella typhimurium-contaminated environment.

Authors:  H S Hurd; J K Gailey; J D McKean; M H Rostagno
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Mucosal competitive exclusion to reduce Salmonella in swine.

Authors:  P J Fedorka-Cray; J S Bailey; N J Stern; N A Cox; S R Ladely; M Musgrove
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Salmonella in slaughter pigs: prevalence, serotypes and critical control points during slaughter in two slaughterhouses.

Authors:  M Swanenburg; H A Urlings; J M Snijders; D A Keuzenkamp; F van Knapen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food--10 States, United States, 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Probiotics reduce bacterial colonization and gastric inflammation in H. pylori-infected mice.

Authors:  Kathene Candace Johnson-Henry; David J Mitchell; Yaron Avitzur; Esther Galindo-Mata; Nicola L Jones; Philip M Sherman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ingestion on experimental salmonellosis in mice.

Authors:  A M Silva; F H F Barbosa; R Duarte; L Q Vieira; R M E Arantes; J R Nicoli
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  In vivo characterization of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 for use as a defined competitive exclusion agent against bacterial pathogens in poultry.

Authors:  R M La Ragione; A Narbad; M J Gasson; M J Woodward
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.858

10.  Relative ability of orally administered Lactobacillus murinus to predominate and persist in the porcine gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Gillian E Gardiner; Pat G Casey; Garrett Casey; P Brendan Lynch; Peadar G Lawlor; Colin Hill; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Bacteriocin production: a probiotic trait?

Authors:  Alleson Dobson; Paul D Cotter; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  From structure to function: the ecology of host-associated microbial communities.

Authors:  Courtney J Robinson; Brendan J M Bohannan; Vincent B Young
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Designer probiotics: Development and applications in gastrointestinal health.

Authors:  Roy D Sleator
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-08-15

4.  Selection of Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus with Inhibitory Activity Against Salmonella and Fecal Coliform Bacteria.

Authors:  Mattika Abhisingha; Jureeporn Dumnil; Chetsadaporn Pitaksutheepong
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 5.  Genome-scale analyses of health-promoting bacteria: probiogenomics.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; Sarah O'Flaherty; Marcus J Claesson; Francesca Turroni; Todd R Klaenhammer; Douwe van Sinderen; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Safety Evaluation and Colonisation Abilities of Four Lactic Acid Bacteria as Future Probiotics.

Authors:  Ziyanda C Dlamini; Rashwahla L S Langa; Olayinka A Aiyegoro; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 7.  Travellers' diarrhoea - pros and cons of different prophylactic measures.

Authors:  Angelika Wagner; Ursula Wiedermann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Feeding the probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain NCIMB 10415 to piglets specifically reduces the number of Escherichia coli pathotypes that adhere to the gut mucosa.

Authors:  Carmen Bednorz; Sebastian Guenther; Kathrin Oelgeschläger; Bianca Kinnemann; Robert Pieper; Susanne Hartmann; Karsten Tedin; Torsten Semmler; Konrad Neumann; Peter Schierack; Astrid Bethe; Lothar H Wieler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Stimulating Effects of Sucrose and Inulin on Growth, Lactate, and Bacteriocin Productions by Pediococcus pentosaceus.

Authors:  Pamela Oliveira de Souza de Azevedo; Attilio Converti; José Manuel Domínguez; Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Probiotic bacteria influence the composition and function of the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Paul W O'Toole; Jakki C Cooney
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.