Literature DB >> 15064883

The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements.

Daniel V Meegan1, Cheryl M Glazebrook, Victoria P Dhillon, Luc Tremblay, Timothy N Welsh, Digby Elliott.   

Abstract

Participants made perceptual judgments about the length of, and manual aiming movements to the opposite end of, formerly visible Müller-Lyer stimuli. The Müller-Lyer illusion affected both perceptual judgments and aiming amplitude. Manipulations of stimulus duration (10 ms or 3000 ms) and memory delay length (10 ms or 3000 ms) had no impact on the illusory effect. Aiming movements executed with vision of the hand were less affected by the illusion than movements executed without vision of the hand. The effect of the illusion on aiming amplitude remained the same between peak velocity and the end of the movement even though participants were engaged in on-line control between peak deceleration and the end of the movement. This latter finding was counter to the predictions of a hypothesis (Glover 2002) stating that illusions should only affect the early (planning) stages of movement and not the late (control) stages of movement. We conclude that a single visual representation is used for perception, motor planning, and motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15064883     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1702-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements.

Authors:  G Binsted; D Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action.

Authors:  S Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-06

3.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements.

Authors:  H Z Zelaznik; B Hawkins; L Kisselburgh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  A visual representation and the control of manual aiming movements.

Authors:  D Elliott; R Calvert; M Jaeger; R Jones
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Grasping an illusion.

Authors:  E Daprati; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  D A Westwood; T McEachern; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott; J Madalena
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1987-08

8.  Decay and interference effects in the short-term retention of a discrete motor act.

Authors:  R L Pepper; L M Herman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-02

9.  The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements.

Authors:  D Elliott; F Allard
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-08

10.  Saccadic programming and perceived location.

Authors:  E Wong; A Mack
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08
View more
  13 in total

1.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Paolo Bernardis; Paul Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby Elliott; Martinus J Buekers; Peter Feys; Elke Heremans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the timing of reference frames for action control.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Jay Pratt; Jos J Adam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The impact of real and illusory target perturbations on manual aiming.

Authors:  Lawrence E M Grierson; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Online corrections can produce illusory bias during closed-loop pointing.

Authors:  C Ehresman; D Saucier; M Heath; G Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping.

Authors:  Sushma Alphonsa; Boyi Dai; Tami Benham-Deal; Qin Zhu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.