Literature DB >> 25535018

Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping.

Sushma Alphonsa1,2, Boyi Dai1, Tami Benham-Deal1, Qin Zhu3.   

Abstract

The speed-accuracy trade-off is a fundamental movement problem that has been extensively investigated. It has been established that the speed at which one can move to tap targets depends on how large the targets are and how far they are apart. These spatial properties of the targets can be quantified by the index of difficulty (ID). Two visual illusions are known to affect the perception of target size and movement amplitude: the Ebbinghaus illusion and Muller-Lyer illusion. We created visual images that combined these two visual illusions to manipulate the perceived ID, and then examined people's visual perception of the targets in illusory context as well as their performance in tapping those targets in both discrete and continuous manners. The findings revealed that the combined visual illusions affected the perceived ID similarly in both discrete and continuous judgment conditions. However, the movement outcomes were affected by the combined visual illusions according to the tapping mode. In discrete tapping, the combined visual illusions affected both movement accuracy and movement amplitude such that the effective ID resembled the perceived ID. In continuous tapping, none of the movement outcomes were affected by the combined visual illusions. Participants tapped the targets with higher speed and accuracy in all visual conditions. Based on these findings, we concluded that distinct visual-motor control mechanisms were responsible for execution of discrete and continuous Fitts' tapping. Although discrete tapping relies on allocentric information (object-centered) to plan for action, continuous tapping relies on egocentric information (self-centered) to control for action. The planning-control model for rapid aiming movements is supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25535018     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0641-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  26 in total

1.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.

Authors:  S R Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceived distance, shape and size.

Authors:  E Brenner; W J van Damme
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Motor adaptation to an optical illusion.

Authors:  S Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Rebecca M C Spencer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Sally A Linkenauger; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-05

6.  Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations.

Authors:  Farshad Nemati
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing.

Authors:  H N Zelaznik; D Lantero
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-06

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ebbinghaus figures that deceive the eye do not necessarily deceive the hand.

Authors:  Hester Knol; Raoul Huys; Jean-Christophe Sarrazin; Andreas Spiegler; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Use of remote data collection methodology to test for an illusory effect on visually guided cursor movements.

Authors:  Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.