Literature DB >> 9460728

Grasping an illusion.

E Daprati1, M Gentilucci.   

Abstract

In the present study we attempted to determine the nature of the visual analysis that is performed on an object in order to grasp it. We required eight healthy subjects to reach and grasp a wooden bar which was superimposed over the shaft of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Vision of both the hand and the bar was allowed. Three different bar lengths were used. Two additional control tasks in which the subjects were required to reproduce the length of the shafts were carried out. The results showed that hand shaping while grasping the bar was influenced by the illusion configurations on which it was superimposed. However, this effect was smaller than that observed in the two tasks of length reproduction. These results support the notion that visual analysis performed on the object of a grasp movement is global and takes into account the object itself, as well as its relationships with surrounding cues. We propose, as suggested previously for reaching movements (Gentilucci, M. et al., Neuropsychologia, 1996, 34, 369-376), two partially independent stages during visuo-motor integration for grasping an object. In the first stage, the object is coded inside an object-centred frame of reference. In the second stage it is transposed in an egocentric frame of reference, in which the spatial relations between object and agent are computed. In this second stage the influence of cues surrounding the target is minimized.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9460728     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00061-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  26 in total

1.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Britt Anderson; James Danckert; Barbara Frühholz; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Examining the crossmodal consequences of viewing the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ayla Tessmer; Gordon Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Kristina A Neely; Jason Yakimishyn; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.