Literature DB >> 20508529

Automated telephone calls improved completion of fecal occult blood testing.

David M Mosen1, Adrianne C Feldstein, Nancy Perrin, A Gabriela Rosales, David H Smith, Elizabeth G Liles, Jennifer L Schneider, Jennifer E Lafata, Ronald E Myers, Michael Kositch, Thomas Hickey, Russell E Glasgow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis is improved by early diagnosis, screening rates remain low.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an automated telephone intervention on completion of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). RESEARCH
DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a not-for-profit health maintenance organization, 5905 eligible patients aged 51 to 80, at average risk for CRC and due for CRC screening, were randomly assigned to an automated telephone intervention (n = 2943) or usual care (UC; n = 2962). The intervention group received up to three 1-minute automated telephone calls that provided a description and health benefits of FOBT. During the call, patients could request that an FOBT kit be mailed to their home. Those who requested but did not return the cards received an automated reminder call. Cox proportional hazard method was used to determine the independent effect of automated telephone calls on completion of an FOBT, after adjusting for age, sex, and prior CRC screening.
RESULTS: By 6 months after call initiation, 22.5% in the intervention and 16.0% in UC had completed an FOBT. Those in the intervention group were significantly more likely to complete an FOBT (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.56) compared with UC. Older patients (aged 71-80 vs. aged 51-60) were also more likely to complete FOBT (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Automated telephone calls increased completion of FOBT. Further research is needed to evaluate automated telephone interventions among diverse populations and in other clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20508529      PMCID: PMC3738295          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbdce7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  26 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Are we doing enough to screen for colorectal cancer? Findings from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors.

Authors:  J A Shapiro; L C Seeff; M R Nadel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Colorectal cancer screening practices among men and women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1999.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Trevor D Thompson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Marion R Nadel; Donald K Blackman; Jean A Shapiro; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Colorectal cancer screening disparities related to obesity and gender.

Authors:  Allison B Rosen; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Kara Keels; Stephanie Schoap; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Erica S Breslau; Allen J Dietrich; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; James L Fisher; Kelly Fleming; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Outreach and Inreach Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos at a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Sheila F Castañeda; Balambal Bharti; Marielena Rojas; Silvia Mercado; Adriana M Bearse; Jasmine Camacho; Manuel Song Lopez; Fatima Muñoz; Shawne O'Connell; Lin Liu; Gregory A Talavera; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Two Medicaid health plans' models and motivations for improving colorectal cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Jennifer K Coury; Jennifer L Schneider; Beverly B Green; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Amanda F Petrik; Jennifer S Rivelli; Malaika R Schwartz; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; C Y Wang; Kathryn Horner; Sheryl Catz; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon; David Carrell; Jessica Chubak; Cynthia Ko; Sharon Laing; Andy Bogart
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Clinical decision support for colon and rectal surgery: an overview.

Authors:  Allison B McCoy; Genevieve B Melton; Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

7.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Among Individuals With and Without Mental Illnesses: A Comparison of 2 Screening Methods.

Authors:  Bobbi Jo H Yarborough; Ginger C Hanson; Nancy A Perrin; Scott P Stumbo; Carla A Green
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-01-27

8.  Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; William M Vollmer; Amanda Petrik; Stephen H Taplin; Timothy E Burdick; Richard T Meenan; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Briton Lee; Shreya Patel; Carly Rachocki; Rachel Issaka; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Gestational diabetes mellitus and postpartum care practices of nurse-midwives.

Authors:  Jean Y Ko; Patricia M Dietz; Elizabeth J Conrey; Loren Rodgers; Cynthia Shellhaas; Sherry L Farr; Cheryl L Robbins
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.