Literature DB >> 15057581

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse: role of levatorplasty.

S W Chun1, A J Pikarsky, S Y You, P Gervaz, J Efron, E Weiss, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of full thickness rectal prolapse remains controversial. Although abdominal approaches have a lower recurrence rate than do perineal operations, they are associated with a higher morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with and without levatorplasty.
METHODS: Between 1989 and 1999, a total of 109 consecutive patients (10 men) underwent 120 perineal procedures. These patients were retrospectively evaluated in two groups on the basis of the type of surgery received: perineal rectosigmoidectomy (PRS) or perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty (PRSL). Subsequent functional outcome and physiological parameters were assessed.
RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 75.7 years (range, 23.0-94.8 years) and they were followed for an overall mean (in both groups combined) of 28.0 months (range, 0.4-126.4 months) after surgery. Mean duration of surgery was 78.1 min (SD=25.9) and 97.6 min (SD=32.3) in PRS and PRSL, respectively ( p=0.002, unpaired t test). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, morbidity or mortality. Recurrence rates and mean time interval to recurrence were, respectively, 20.6% and 45.5 months in PRS compared to 7.7% and 13.3 months in PRSL ( p=0.049, chi-square test; p=0.001, unpaired t test). Both groups had significant improvements in postoperative incontinence score ( p<0.0001, Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-ranks test), however, there were no significant changes in anorectal manometric findings and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatorplasty is associated with a lower recurrence rate and a longer time to recurrence than perineal rectosigmoidectomy alone. Levatorplasty should be offered to patients when a perineal approach for rectal prolapse is selected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057581     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-004-0042-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  18 in total

1.  The Altemeier procedure using biologic mesh.

Authors:  S Atallah; M Albert; T H deBeche-Adams; S Larach
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Perineal Approaches to Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Louis R Barfield
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

5.  Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; T J C Paulides; N A Wijffels; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Short-term outcomes of local correction of stoma prolapse with a stapler device.

Authors:  K Masumori; K Maeda; T Hanai; H Sato; Y Koide; H Matsuoka; H Katsuno; M Shiota
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Explaining the undulating outcomes of perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier Procedure) for rectal prolapse over the last century: technique matters!

Authors:  W C Cirocco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) in elderly patients for external rectal prolapse: early experience.

Authors:  E Ram; H Krissi; A Zbar; E Atar; S Joubran; L Rath-Wolfson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Medical and surgical management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation.

Authors:  Ron Schey; John Cromwell; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse: is it worthwhile in the long-term?

Authors:  C Tschuor; P Limani; A Nocito; D Dindo; P-A Clavien; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.