BACKGROUND: Full-thickness rectal prolapse in frail elderly patients is often treated by a perineal approach with considerable attendant morbidity. We report our preliminary results of the perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) technique for resection of full-thickness external rectal prolapse using a new reloadable Contour(®) Transtar™ stapler (Ethicon Endo-Surgery) device. METHODS: Fourteen elderly high-risk patients with an external prolapse up to 10 cm in length were treated between April 2010 and October 2011, and operative factors, outcome and recurrence rates were assessed. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative difficulties and no perioperative morbidity. The median operating time was 35 min (range 25-45 min) with a median hospital stay of 3 days (range 3-5 days). Four patients developed early recurrence over a median follow-up of 32 months (range 25-41 months). CONCLUSIONS: PSPR is safer, faster and easier to perform than other conventional perineal prolapse procedures and is suitable for elderly, high-risk patients for whom an abdominal approach under general anesthesia is not advisable.
BACKGROUND: Full-thickness rectal prolapse in frail elderly patients is often treated by a perineal approach with considerable attendant morbidity. We report our preliminary results of the perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) technique for resection of full-thickness external rectal prolapse using a new reloadable Contour(®) Transtar™ stapler (Ethicon Endo-Surgery) device. METHODS: Fourteen elderly high-risk patients with an external prolapse up to 10 cm in length were treated between April 2010 and October 2011, and operative factors, outcome and recurrence rates were assessed. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative difficulties and no perioperative morbidity. The median operating time was 35 min (range 25-45 min) with a median hospital stay of 3 days (range 3-5 days). Four patients developed early recurrence over a median follow-up of 32 months (range 25-41 months). CONCLUSIONS: PSPR is safer, faster and easier to perform than other conventional perineal prolapse procedures and is suitable for elderly, high-risk patients for whom an abdominal approach under general anesthesia is not advisable.
Authors: L Lenisa; O Schwandner; A Stuto; D Jayne; F Pigot; J J Tuech; R Scherer; K Nugent; F Corbisier; E Espin-Basany; F H Hetzer Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: A Senapati; R G Gray; L J Middleton; J Harding; R K Hills; N C M Armitage; L Buckley; J M A Northover Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Bianka Hummel; Julia Hardt; Stephan Bischofberger; Franc Hetzer; Rene Warschkow; Marcel Zadnikar; Walter Brunner; Bernhard Widmann; Bruno Schmied; Lukas Marti Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 3.445