Literature DB >> 23613218

Perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse: is it worthwhile in the long-term?

C Tschuor1, P Limani, A Nocito, D Dindo, P-A Clavien, D Hahnloser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perineal stapled prolapse (PSP) resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. However, no long-term results have been reported in the literature. This study analyses the long-term recurrence rate, functional outcome, and morbidity associated with PSP resection.
METHODS: Nine consecutive patients undergoing PSP resection between 2007 and 2011 were prospectively followed. Surgery was performed by the same surgeons in a standardised technique. Recurrence rate, functional outcome, and complication grade were prospectively assessed.
RESULTS: All 9 patients undergoing PSP resection were investigated. The median age was 72 years (range 25-88 years). No intraoperative complications occurred. Faecal incontinence, preoperatively present in 2 patients, worsened postoperatively in one patient (Vaizey 18-22). One patient developed new-onset faecal incontinence (Vaizey 18). The median obstructive defecation syndrome score decreased postoperatively significantly from 11 (median; range 8-13) to 5 (median; range 4-8) (p < 0.005). At a median follow-up of 40 months (range 14-58 months), the prolapse recurrence rate was 44 % (4/9 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: The PSP resection is a fast and safe procedure associated with low morbidity. However, the poor long-term functional outcome and the recurrence rate of 44 % warrant a cautious patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613218     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-013-1009-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  20 in total

Review 1.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): a review of physiology, technique and outcome.

Authors:  A P Zbar; S Takashima; T Hasegawa; K Kitabayashi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy.

Authors:  J G Williams; D A Rothenberger; R D Madoff; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Treatment of extensive prolapse of the rectum in aged or debilitated patients.

Authors:  W A ALTEMEIER; J GIUSEFFI; P HOXWORTH
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1952-07

4.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection for complete external rectal prolapse: preliminary experience and literature review.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Paolo Tonello; Marco Ettore Allaix; Roberto Borroni; Nicola Canavesio; Franco Corno
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  F Agachan; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Evaluation of Delorme's procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A M Watts; M R Thompson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  M H Kimmins; B K Evetts; J Isler; R Billingham
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection: a new procedure for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Roland Scherer; Lukas Marti; Franc H Hetzer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  O B Johansen; S D Wexner; N Daniel; J J Nogueras; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  9 in total

1.  Perineal stapled rectal resection without a contour transtar: a modified approach.

Authors:  Gökhan Özüner; Çiğdem Benlice
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-01-03

Review 2.  [Complications after rectal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  [Transtar™ operation for rectocele and obstructed defecation syndrome].

Authors:  C Isbert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Explaining the undulating outcomes of perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier Procedure) for rectal prolapse over the last century: technique matters!

Authors:  W C Cirocco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) in elderly patients for external rectal prolapse: early experience.

Authors:  E Ram; H Krissi; A Zbar; E Atar; S Joubran; L Rath-Wolfson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Primary and repeated perineal stapled prolapse resection.

Authors:  D Raahave; A K Jensen; L Dammegaard; I K Pedersen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  [Operative therapy of external rectal prolapse with a stapler].

Authors:  R Scherer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  New kid on the block: perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSP) is it worthwhile in the long-term?

Authors:  Bianka Hummel; Julia Hardt; Stephan Bischofberger; Franc Hetzer; Rene Warschkow; Marcel Zadnikar; Walter Brunner; Bernhard Widmann; Bruno Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.445

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.