Literature DB >> 15046428

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study.

S Glyn-Jones1, H S Gill, P McLardy-Smith, D W Murray.   

Abstract

The Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) arthroplasty is a metal-on-metal prosthesis for which no medium- or long-term results have been published. Despite this, it is increasing in popularity as an alternative to stemmed prostheses for younger patients. Since the fixation of the socket is conventional, the major concern is long-term failure of the femoral component. This can be predicted by the use of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). We have therefore undertaken such a study of the BHR femoral component over a period of two years. Twenty patients (22 hips) underwent a standard BHR procedure. Migration of the femoral component was measured by RSA at intervals of three, six, 12 and 24 months. At 24 months the total three-dimensional migration of the head was 0.2 mm. This was not statistically significant. Previous studies have shown that implants which loosen quickly have rapid early migration. Our results therefore suggest that the BHR femoral component is an inherently stable device which is likely to perform well in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046428     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.14371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Radiostereometric analysis: the hip.

Authors:  F Bottner; E Su; B Nestor; B Azzis; T P Sculco; M Bostrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2005-09

3.  Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.

Authors:  Thomas Baad-Hansen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bone density of the femoral neck following Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nick J Cooke; Lauren Rodgers; David Rawlings; Andrew W McCaskie; James P Holland
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Nanostructured diamond coatings for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  S A Catledge; V Thomas; Y K Vohra
Journal:  Woodhead Publ Ser Biomater       Date:  2013

7.  Measurement of migration of a humeral head resurfacing prosthesis using radiostereometry without implant marking: an experimental study.

Authors:  Olof Sköldenberg; Magnus Odquist
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Hannu T Aro; Charles Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  No association between serum metal ions and implant fixation in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mette Holm Hjorth; Kjeld Søballe; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Nina Dyrberg Lorenzen; Inger Mechlenburg; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gavin E Bartlett; David J Beard; David W Murray; Harinderjit S Gill
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.