Literature DB >> 15042286

Graft healing in a bone tunnel: bone-attached graft with screw fixation versus bone-free graft with extra-articular suture fixation.

Hideo Kawakami1, Konsei Shino, Masayuki Hamada, Ken Nakata, Shigeto Nakagawa, Norimasa Nakamura, Yukiyoshi Toritsuka, Hideki Yoshikawa, Takahiro Ochi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in tendon graft-to-bone tunnel healing between bone-attached tendon grafts with interference-screw fixation and bone-free tendon grafts with extra-articular suture fixation. In 42 Japanese White rabbits, anterior half replacement of the medial collateral ligament was performed using half of the ipsilateral patellar tendon. At the femoral attachment, the bone-plug-attached graft was fixed with an interference screw (group A). The bone-plug-free graft was fixed by the extra-articular suture fixation technique with sutures tied over a button (group B). Biomechanical and histological evaluations were performed at 2, 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. In biomechanical evaluation, at 2 or 4 weeks 27 of 28 specimens (96%) were pulled out from the femoral tunnel, while one 4-week specimen and all four 8-week specimens failed at the graft's mid-substance. At 2 weeks, the maximum failure load was 25+/-10 N and 24+/-6 N for group A and group B respectively (mean+/-SD). At 4 weeks, the maximum failure load was 42+/-17 N and 35+/-15 N respectively. There were no significant differences in maximum pullout failure load between the groups at 2 or 4 weeks postoperatively. (P=0.887 at 2 weeks and P=0.339 at 4 weeks using ANOVA measurement). Histologically, the bone-attached grafts showed partial bone-to-bone union at the graft-bone tunnel interface at 4 weeks, and complete bony union at 8 weeks. The bone-free grafts exhibited newly formed Sharpey-like collagen fibers at 4 weeks, and strong connection by mature granulation tissue at 8 weeks. Graft-to-bone tunnel healing of bone-attached graft with screw fixation and bone-free graft with extra-articular suture fixation are comparable in terms of biomechanical evaluation during the early postoperative periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15042286     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0484-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  17 in total

1.  Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; M Nagano; M Kurosaka; H Muratsu; K Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Reinhard F G Hoffmann; Hermann J Bail; Oliver Rehm; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  F Tomita; K Yasuda; S Mikami; T Sakai; S Yamazaki; H Tohyama
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Effect of freeze-drying or gamma-irradiation on remodeling of tendon allograft in a rat model.

Authors:  Y Toritsuka; K Shino; S Horibe; N Nakamura; N Matsumoto; T Ochi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system.

Authors:  Y Ishibashi; T W Rudy; G A Livesay; J D Stone; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M Kurosaka; S Yoshiya; J T Andrish
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Mechanical properties of primate vascularized vs. nonvascularized patellar tendon grafts; changes over time.

Authors:  D L Butler; E S Grood; F R Noyes; M L Olmstead; R B Hohn; S P Arnoczky; M G Siegel
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  An analysis of autograft fixation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model.

Authors:  W A Grana; D M Egle; R Mahnken; C W Goodhart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

1.  An histological study of the influence of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics on tendon healing pattern in a bone tunnel with suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Hao Shen; Gang Qiao; Hongbin Cao; Yao Jiang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone-to-bone integrations were complete within 5 months after anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Hironari Masuda; Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Naoya Shimazaki; Nobuhiro Nishihara; Seikai Toyooka; Hirotaka Kawano; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Ligament regeneration using an absorbable stent-shaped poly-L-lactic acid scaffold in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Hanako Nishimoto; Takeshi Kokubu; Atsuyuki Inui; Yutaka Mifune; Kotaro Nishida; Hiroyuki Fujioka; Kumiko Yokota; Chiaki Hiwa; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of Fixed- and Variable-Loop Button Fixation in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Vijay Chandru; Santhosh M S; Sujana Theja J S; Rohit R Nair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-17

5.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Study Between Adjustable and Fixed Length Suspension Devices.

Authors:  Bastian Uribe-Echevarria; Justin A Magnuson; Annunziato Amendola; Matthew J Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Results of Outside-in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Fixed- and Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Fixation.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Taeg Su Ko; Yong Seuk Lee; Hwa Jae Jeong; Jong Kuen Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 7.  Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarvpreet Singh; Shalin Shaunak; Sebastian C K Shaw; John L Anderson; Vipul Mandalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.