Literature DB >> 29663013

Bone-to-bone integrations were complete within 5 months after anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Hironari Masuda1, Shuji Taketomi2, Hiroshi Inui2, Naoya Shimazaki3, Nobuhiro Nishihara1, Seikai Toyooka1, Hirotaka Kawano1, Takumi Nakagawa4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft is known to provide secure fixation due to the direct bone-to-bone integration of the bone plug and bone tunnel. It is important to know the time required for bone integration when designing the postoperative rehabilitation protocol or deciding when the patient can return to competition-level activity, especially if the patient is an athlete. However, because reports are scarce, the period necessary for bone-to-bone integration after ACL reconstruction using a BTB graft remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify this issue. It was hypothesised that ACL reconstruction using a BTB graft via an anatomical rectangular tunnel would help in the integration between bone plugs and bone tunnels on both the femoral and tibial sides after at least 6 months, at which point basic exercises similar to pre-injury sporting activity levels can be resumed.
METHODS: This study included 40 knees treated with ACL reconstruction using a BTB graft via anatomical rectangular tunnel reconstruction between 2013 and 2014 in a single institute. The integration between bone plugs and bone tunnels was evaluated using multi-slice tomosynthesis, which is a technique for producing slice images using conventional radiographic systems, at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively. All procedures were performed by two experienced surgeons. Bone integration was evaluated by two orthopaedic doctors.
RESULTS: The rates of integration of the bone plug and femoral bone tunnel on tomosynthesis at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively were 0, 55, and 100%, respectively. On the tibial side, the corresponding rates were 0, 75, and 100%, respectively. The rate of integration on the tibial side was significantly higher than that on the femoral side at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: Bone-to-bone integration on the femoral and tibial sides was complete within 5 months after surgery in all cases. Since the time required for bone integration is important in designing the postoperative rehabilitation approach, these results will serve as a useful guideline for planning rehabilitation protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anatomical rectangular tunnel; Bone–patellar tendon–bone graft; EndoButton

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663013     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4938-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; M Nagano; M Kurosaka; H Muratsu; K Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Reinhard F G Hoffmann; Hermann J Bail; Oliver Rehm; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Clinical potential of digital linear tomosynthesis imaging of total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Hiroshi Hirano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Rectangular tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft to mimic natural fiber arrangement.

Authors:  Konsei Shino; Ken Nakata; Norimasa Nakamura; Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Shuji Horibe; Shigeto Nakagawa; Tomoyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Postoperative follow-up of olecranon fracture by digital tomosynthesis radiography.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Toshiyuki Yuhara; John M Sabol; Mieko Tamura; Yutaka Shimada; Eiko Ueno
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up.

Authors:  Randy Mascarenhas; Michael J Tranovich; Eric J Kropf; Freddie H Fu; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

Authors:  Brian T Samuelsen; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Anatomic ACL reconstruction: rectangular tunnel/bone-patellar tendon-bone or triple-bundle/semitendinosus tendon grafting.

Authors:  Konsei Shino; Tatsuo Mae; Yuta Tachibana
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  2 in total

1.  A more flattened bone tunnel has a positive effect on tendon-bone healing in the early period after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Fengyuan Zhao; Xiaoqing Hu; Jiahao Zhang; Weili Shi; Bo Ren; Hongjie Huang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tomosynthesis Is Equivalent to Computed Tomography for Evaluating Osseous Integration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Seikai Toyooka; Hironari Masuda; Nobuhiro Nishihara; Naoya Shimazaki; Shuji Ando; Hirotaka Kawano; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.