Literature DB >> 32742219

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Study Between Adjustable and Fixed Length Suspension Devices.

Bastian Uribe-Echevarria1, Justin A Magnuson2, Annunziato Amendola3, Matthew J Bollier4, Brian R Wolf4, Carolyn M Hettrich5.   

Abstract

Background: Adjustable-length cortical suspension devices provide technical advantages over fixed-length devices for femoral graft fixation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction but have shown increased lengthening during cyclic loading in biomechanical studies. The purpose of this study was to prospectively measure graft elongation in vivo along with patient reported outcomes.
Methods: Thirty-seven skeletally mature patients diagnosed with anterior cruciate insufficiency who underwent ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring graft were included in this study. Thirteen patients received an ACL reconstruction using a fixed loop device (FL) and twenty-four patients were treated with an adjustable-length device (AL) based on surgeon preference. Bilateral knee laxity was measured with a KT1000 Arthrometer before surgery and immediately after surgery with the patient under anesthesia, and at the 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month clinical follow-up appointments. All measurements were made by the same operator with maximum force testing. Differences between the affected knee and the contralateral knee were measured. Patient reported outcomes were collected at 6 and 24 months post-operatively.
Results: No difference was found between the FL and AL groups in either knee laxity or patient reported outcomes. Average side-to-side difference at 6 months was 1.8 ± 2.6 mm for the FL group and 1.7 ± 2.4 mm for the AL group (p=.874). One patient in the FL group (7.7%) and two in the AL group (9.5%) had a side to side difference in laxity greater 5 mm. Patient reported outcomes did not differ between groups and no patients underwent revision surgery. Conclusions: The adjustable-length cortical suspension device (AL) did not demonstrate increased laxity as compared to fixed-length devices. There was no difference in patient reported outcomes between the groups.Level of Evidence: IV.
Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; cortical button; cortical suspension; endobutton; soft tissue graft; tightrope

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32742219      PMCID: PMC7368520     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  27 in total

1.  The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site.

Authors:  Petteri Kousa; Teppo L N Järvinen; Mika Vihavainen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Complications following hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with femoral cross-pin fixation.

Authors:  Hamza Ozer; Ali Oznur
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Nadine Diermann; Tobias Schumacher; Steffen Schanz; Freddie H Fu; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Suspensory fixation of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of 3 implants.

Authors:  Florian S Kamelger; Ursula Onder; Werner Schmoelz; Katja Tecklenburg; Rohit Arora; Christian Fink
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Benjamin M Petre; Sean D Smith; Kyle S Jansson; Peter-Paul de Meijer; Thomas R Hackett; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Defining Thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the IKDC Subjective Knee Form and KOOS for Patients Who Underwent ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Bart Muller; Mohammad A Yabroudi; Andrew Lynch; Chung-Liang Lai; C Niek van Dijk; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Influence of examiner experience and gender on interrater reliability of KT-1000 arthrometer measurements.

Authors:  B T Ballantyne; A K French; S L Heimsoth; A F Kachingwe; J B Lee; G L Soderberg
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1995-10

8.  Hamstrings--an anterior cruciate ligament protagonist. An in vitro study.

Authors:  R C More; B T Karras; R Neiman; D Fritschy; S L Woo; D M Daniel
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Sumito Kawamura; Hyon-Jeong Kim; Christian Dynybil; Liang Ying
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

1.  Adjustable-loop implants are non-inferior to fixed-loop implants for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Simone B Elmholt; Torsten G Nielsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Fixed-loop vs. adjustable-loop cortical button devices for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simone Birkebæk Elmholt; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.