Literature DB >> 17516129

Clinical and serological correlates of antinucleosome antibodies in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus.

M Tikly1, T Gould2, A A Wadee3, E van der Westhuizen3, B B N Mokgethwa3.   

Abstract

Antinucleosome antibodies (AnuA) are increasingly recognized as an important biomarker in the diagnosis and subset stratification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and clinico-serological correlates of AnuA in black South Africans with SLE. We performed a cross-sectional study of 86 SLE patients attending a tertiary center and 87 control subjects. AnuA were tested using a second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AnuA were 45.3, 94.3, 88.6, and 63.6%, respectively. The presence of AnuA were strongly associated with the co-presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies (OR = 3.4, p < 0.0005) and antihistone antibodies (OR = 15.7, p < 0.00001). Patients who were seropositive for AnuA were more likely to have skin involvement (discoid lupus and/or malar rash) and had higher SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) scores and Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) damage scores (p < 0.05). IgG anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) levels showed a significant correlation with AnuA ratios (p < 0.01). Our findings provide further evidence that AnuA are a sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarker in SLE. Moreover, our finding that the presence of AnuA, but not anti-dsDNA antibodies, are associated with worse SLICC/ACR damage scores suggest that AnuA may have a role in predicting disease outcome. The correlation between IgG aCL and AnuA is a novel finding that merits further studies to determine possible common peptide specificities of the antibodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17516129     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-007-0637-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  26 in total

1.  Clinical utility of selected disease activity markers in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  P Horák; V Scudla; Z Hermanovó; Z Pospisil; L Faltýnek; M Budiková; L Kusá
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  The role of nucleosomes in lupus.

Authors:  Z Amoura; S Koutouzov; J C Piette
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE.

Authors:  C Bombardier; D D Gladman; M B Urowitz; D Caron; C H Chang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-06

4.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M C Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-09

5.  The relevance of autoantigen source and cutoff definition in antichromatin (nucleosome) antibody immunoassays.

Authors:  Danilo Villalta; Renato Tozzoli; Nicola Bizzaro; Elio Tonutti; Anna Ghirardello; Andrea Doria
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Studies of human polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies binding to lupus autoantigens and cross-reactive antigens.

Authors:  A Sharma; D Isenberg; B Diamond
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Anti-nucleosome antibody: significance in lupus patients lacking anti-double-stranded DNA antibody.

Authors:  D J Min; S J Kim; S H Park; Y I Seo; H J Kang; W U Kim; C S Cho; H Y Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Correlations between antinucleosome antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, C3, C4, and clinical activity in lupus patients.

Authors:  S Saisoong; S Eiam-Ong; O Hanvivatvong
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 9.  The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  D Gladman; E Ginzler; C Goldsmith; P Fortin; M Liang; M Urowitz; P Bacon; S Bombardieri; J Hanly; E Hay; D Isenberg; J Jones; K Kalunian; P Maddison; O Nived; M Petri; M Richter; J Sanchez-Guerrero; M Snaith; G Sturfelt; D Symmons; A Zoma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1996-03

10.  Anticardiolipin, anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I and antiprothrombin antibodies in black South African patients with infectious disease.

Authors:  S Loizou; S Singh; E Wypkema; R A Asherson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  4 in total

1.  New evidence for roles of antinucleosome antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  De-Guang Wang; Li Hao; Hai-Feng Pan; Dong-Qing Ye
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Pediatric lupus--are there differences in presentation, genetics, response to therapy, and damage accrual compared with adult lupus?

Authors:  Rina Mina; Hermine I Brunner
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  High-titer antichromatin antibody is associated with proliferative class IV of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  J F Carvalho; V S T Viana; E F Borba; A P do Nascimento; E P Leon; L A Testagrossa; R T Barros; E Bonfá
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease.

Authors:  Sonal Mehra; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.818

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.