Literature DB >> 23857662

Immunoserological parameters in SLE: high-avidity anti-dsDNA detected by ELISA are the most closely associated with the disease activity.

Sladjana Andrejevic1, Ivica Jeremic, Mirjana Sefik-Bukilica, Milos Nikolic, Biljana Stojimirovic, Branka Bonaci-Nikolic.   

Abstract

We assessed the relationship between the serum levels of antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), C1q, nucleosomes, histones, C3 and C4 complement components with one another, with organ involvement and overall disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). One hundred seventy-five sera from 99 patients with SLE, 31 sera of patients with other connective tissue diseases, and 20 sera from healthy blood donors were tested. SLE disease activity was assessed by modified SLEDAI-2K (M-SLEDAI-2K), not including complement and anti-dsDNA descriptors. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were measured by indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae (CLIFT), standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ELISA for high-avidity antibodies. The most significant risk factor for renal involvement were anti-C1q antibodies (OR = 3.88, p < 0.05), high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies for polyserositis (OR = 7.99, p < 0.01), anti-histone antibodies for joint involvement (OR = 2.75, p < 0.05), and low C3 for cytopenia (OR = 11.96, p < 0.001) and mucocutaneous lesions (OR = 3.32, p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that disease activity in SLE could be predicted by the levels of antibodies against dsDNA determined by standard (p < 0.05) and high-avidity (p < 0.001) ELISA, and inversely associated with concentration of C3 (p < 0.001). Using stepwise method, high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies were found to be in the closest association to M-SLEDAI-2K. Moreover, positive test for high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies appeared as an independent risk factor for moderately to severely active disease (M-SLEDAI-2K>5) (OR = 5.5, p < 0.01). The presence of high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies represented a risk for renal, joint, and most importantly for serosal involvement. Our results suggest that simple and reliable ELISA for high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies is the test of good clinical utility for the assessment of global SLE activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23857662     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-013-2330-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  41 in total

1.  Classification and definition of major flares in SLE clinical trials.

Authors:  M Petri; J Buyon; M Kim
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.911

2.  Performance of anti-C1q, antinucleosome, and anti-dsDNA antibodies for detecting concurrent disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Chi Chiu Mok; Ling Yin Ho; Hoi Wah Leung; Lap Gate Wong
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.

Authors:  A Antico; S Platzgummer; D Bassetti; N Bizzaro; R Tozzoli; D Villalta
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.911

Review 4.  The role of nucleosomes in lupus.

Authors:  Z Amoura; S Koutouzov; J C Piette
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of currently available anti-double-stranded DNA antibody assays. An Italian multicentre study.

Authors:  Anna Ghirardello; Danilo Villalta; Gabriella Morozzi; Antonella Afeltra; Mauro Galeazzi; Roberto Gerli; Alessandro Mathieu; Pier Luigi Meroni; Francesca Pregnolato; Paola Migliorini; Antonella Radice; Valeria Riccieri; Amelia Ruffatti; Gian Domenico Sebastiani; Renato Alberto Sinico; Angela Tincani; Andrea Doria
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Clinical disease activity and titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies measured by an automated immunofluorescence assay in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M López-Hoyos; R Cabeza; V M Martínez-Taboada; J Crespo; D SanSegundo; R Blanco; H López-Escribano; M Peña; V Rodríguez-Valverde
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.911

7.  Anti-histone reactivity in systemic lupus erythematosus sera: a disease activity index linked to the presence of DNA:anti-DNA immune complexes.

Authors:  J P Viard; D Choquette; H Chabre; F B Slama; J Primo; M Letrait; A Venot; L Jacob
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.815

8.  Correlations between antinucleosome antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, C3, C4, and clinical activity in lupus patients.

Authors:  S Saisoong; S Eiam-Ong; O Hanvivatvong
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Use of a new fluorescence immunoassay to detect anti-dsDNA antibodies is more correlated with disease activity and complement than the ELISA method in SLE patients.

Authors:  C Y Chen; H M Tseng; L C Chen; C H Tsao; M L Kuo; L S Ou; J L Huang
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.911

10.  Anti-C1q autoantibodies deposit in glomeruli but are only pathogenic in combination with glomerular C1q-containing immune complexes.

Authors:  Leendert A Trouw; Tom W L Groeneveld; Marc A Seelen; Jacques M G J Duijs; Ingeborg M Bajema; Frans A Prins; Uday Kishore; David J Salant; J Sjef Verbeek; Cees van Kooten; Mohamed R Daha
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  15 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of serum complement C3 and C4 levels in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Hejun Li; Shunping Lin; Shangchih Yang; Ling Chen; Xiangxiong Zheng
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The performance of different anti-dsDNA autoantibodies assays in Chinese systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Authors:  Jiangfeng Zhao; Kaiwen Wang; Xiaodong Wang; Ting Li; Li Guo; Liyang Gu; Zhiwei Chen; Fangfang Sun; Haiting Wang; Jiajie Li; Jiaxian Huang; Peng Zhang; Yang Tang; Shuang Ye
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Differentiating between UCTD and early-stage SLE: from definitions to clinical approach.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Dario Roccatello; Massimo Radin; Ioannis Parodis; Jinoos Yazdany; Guillermo Pons-Estel; Marta Mosca
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Level and avidity of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies specific to lactoferrin are useful biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Mirjana Gajic-Veljic; Branislav Lekic; Milos Nikolic; Jovan Lalosevic; Biljana Stojimirovic; Branka Bonaci-Nikolic
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  Bortezomib: a proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Naeemeh Khalesi; Shahla Korani; Mitra Korani; Thomas P Johnston; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  The Utilization of Autoantibodies in Approaches to Precision Health.

Authors:  Marvin J Fritzler; Laura Martinez-Prat; May Y Choi; Michael Mahler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Total Serum Calcium Level Is Negatively Correlated With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity.

Authors:  Yeqin Sha; Zhilian Rui; Yuxiang Dong; Xiyi Wei; Yuning Zhou; Xiaoxue Ye; Lianping He; Dongyan Shi
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Genetic polymorphisms of IL-27 and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus disease in the Egyptian population.

Authors:  Yasser B M Ali; Basima A El-Akhras; R El-Shazly; Iman H Bassyouni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Serological and Genetic Evidence for Altered Complement System Functionality in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Findings of the GAPAID Consortium.

Authors:  József Prechl; Krisztián Papp; Zoltán Hérincs; Hajna Péterfy; Veronika Lóránd; Zoltán Szittner; Andone Estonba; Paolo Rovero; Ilaria Paolini; Jokin Del Amo; Maria Uribarri; Maria Claudia Alcaro; Otsanda Ruiz-Larrañaga; Paola Migliorini; László Czirják
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Anti-double Stranded DNA Antibodies: Origin, Pathogenicity, and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Yumin Xia
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.