Literature DB >> 1504026

Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy.

C A Curcio1, K R Sloan.   

Abstract

Disorder in the packing geometry of the human cone mosaic is believed to help alleviate spatial aliasing effects. To characterize cone packing geometry, we gathered positions of cone inner segments at seven locations along four primary and two oblique meridians in an adult human retina. We generated statistical descriptors based on the distribution of distances and angles to Voronoi neighbors. Parameters of a compressed-jittered model were fit to the actual mosaic. Local anisotropies were investigated using correlograms. We find that (1) median distance between Voronoi neighbors increases with eccentricity, but the minimum distance is constant (6-8 microns) across peripheral retina; (2) the cone mosaic is least compressed and jittered at the edge of the foveal rod-free zone; (3) disorder in the foveal center resembles that described by Pum et al. (1990); (4) cone spacing is 10-15% less in one direction than in the orthogonal direction; and (5) cone spacing is greater in the radial direction (along meridians) than in the tangential direction (along lines of isoeccentricity). The nearly constant minimum distance implies that high spatial frequencies may be sampled even in peripheral retina. Local anisotropy of the cone mosaic is discussed in relation to the growth of the primate retina during development and to the orientation biases of retinal ganglion cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1504026     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800009639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  49 in total

1.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Assessment of Different Sampling Methods for Measuring and Representing Macular Cone Density Using Flood-Illuminated Adaptive Optics.

Authors:  Shu Feng; Michael J Gale; Jonathan D Fay; Ambar Faridi; Hope E Titus; Anupam K Garg; Keith V Michaels; Laura R Erker; Dawn Peters; Travis B Smith; Mark E Pennesi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  The organization of the cone photoreceptor mosaic measured in the living human retina.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Alberto de Castro; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope with integrated wide-field retinal imaging and tracking.

Authors:  R Daniel Ferguson; Zhangyi Zhong; Daniel X Hammer; Mircea Mujat; Ankit H Patel; Cong Deng; Weiyao Zou; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope for stabilized retinal imaging.

Authors:  Daniel X Hammer; R Daniel Ferguson; Chad E Bigelow; Nicusor V Iftimia; Teoman E Ustun; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Measuring macular pigment optical density in vivo: a review of techniques.

Authors:  Olivia Howells; Frank Eperjesi; Hannah Bartlett
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age.

Authors:  Hongxin Song; Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Zhangyi Zhong; Ann E Elsner; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  In vivo autofluorescence imaging of the human and macaque retinal pigment epithelial cell mosaic.

Authors:  Jessica I W Morgan; Alfredo Dubra; Robert Wolfe; William H Merigan; David R Williams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Avian cone photoreceptors tile the retina as five independent, self-organizing mosaics.

Authors:  Yoseph A Kram; Stephanie Mantey; Joseph C Corbo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.