Literature DB >> 15031240

Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear.

Tim van Zwanenberg1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15031240      PMCID： PMC381226          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  GMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed on.

Authors:  D Newble
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

Review 2.  Revalidation of doctors in Canada.

Authors:  W D Dauphinee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

3.  GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical, or fair.

Authors:  R Wakeford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-11

4.  Portfolio-based assessments in medical education: are they valid and reliable for summative purposes?

Authors:  Chris Roberts; David I Newble; Alan J O'Rourke
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Appraisal makes for effective revalidation (official).

Authors:  Richard E Wakeford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-19

Review 6.  Appraisal: the catalyst of personal development.

Authors:  Maurice Conlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-16

7.  Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.

Authors:  Mike Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  General practice in the 1990s: a personal view on future developments.

Authors:  D Irvine
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.386
  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Revalidation: swallow hard.

Authors:  Geoff Wong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-01

2.  Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Malcolm Lewis; Richard Evans; Hayley Hutchings
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  GP perceptions of appraisal: professional development, performance management, or both?

Authors:  Oliver Boylan; Terry Bradley; Agnes McKnight
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Revalidation: cracks at first, now chasms.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Revalidation: a critical perspective.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Geoff Wong
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  National programmes for validating physician competence and fitness for practice: a scoping review.

Authors:  Tanya Horsley; Jocelyn Lockyer; Elise Cogo; Jeanie Zeiter; Ford Bursey; Craig Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Evolving Purposes of Medical Revalidation in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study of Professional and Regulatory Narratives.

Authors:  Abigail Tazzyman; Jane Ferguson; Kieran Walshe; Alan Boyd; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Charlotte Hillier; Samantha Regan De Bere; Julian Archer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  The implementation of medical revalidation: an assessment using normalisation process theory.

Authors:  Abigail Tazzyman; Jane Ferguson; Charlotte Hillier; Alan Boyd; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Julian Archer; Sam Regan de Bere; Kieran Walshe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.