Literature DB >> 16004741

GP perceptions of appraisal: professional development, performance management, or both?

Oliver Boylan1, Terry Bradley, Agnes McKnight.   

Abstract

GPs' perceptions of the tension between the professional development and revalidation aspects of the current GP appraisal scheme were analysed. Evidence was gathered from focus groups representing general practice in Northern Ireland. The results indicate that there is support for the professional development aspects of appraisal but the link with revalidation is problematic, thereby potentially undermining GP support for the scheme. Greater clarity about the precise nature of the linkage is required to avoid a process that fails to fully satisfy the requirements of either appraisal or revalidation.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16004741      PMCID: PMC1472803     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  4 in total

Review 1.  Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tim Freeman
Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res       Date:  2002-05

2.  Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear.

Authors:  Tim van Zwanenberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

3.  Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.

Authors:  Malcolm Lewis; Glyn Elwyn; Fiona Wood
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Revalidation for general practitioners: randomised comparison of two revalidation models.

Authors:  David Bruce; Katie Phillips; Ross Reid; David Snadden; Ronald Harden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Using clinical supervision to improve the quality and safety of patient care: a response to Berwick and Francis.

Authors:  Jonathon Tomlinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.

Authors:  Jeremy Dale; Rachel Potter; Katherine Owen; Jonathan Leach
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.