Literature DB >> 11175495

Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire--Brazil Roland-Morris.

L Nusbaum1, J Natour, M B Ferraz, J Goldenberg.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to translate the Roland-Morris (RM) questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and adapt and validate it. First 3 English teachers independently translated the original questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and a consensus version was generated. Later, 3 other translators, blind to the original questionnaire, performed a back translation. This version was then compared with the original English questionnaire. Discrepancies were discussed and solved by a panel of 3 rheumatologists and the final Brazilian version was established (Brazil-RM). This version was then pretested on 30 chronic low back pain patients consecutively selected from the spine disorders outpatient clinic. In addition to the traditional clinical outcome measures, the Brazil-RM, a 6-point pain scale (from no pain to unbearable pain), and its numerical pain rating scale (PS) (0 to 5) and a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 to 10) were administered twice by one interviewer (1 week apart) and once by one independent interviewer. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed to assess test-retest and interobserver reliability. Cross-sectional construct validity was evaluated using the SCC. In the pretesting session, all questions were well understood by the patients. The mean time of questionnaire administration was 4 min and 53 s. The SCC and ICC were 0.88 (P<0.01) and 0.94, respectively, for the test-retest reliability and 0.86 (P<0.01) and 0.95, respectively, for interobserver reliability. The correlation coefficient was 0.80 (P<0.01) between the PS and Brazil-RM score and 0.79 (P<0.01) between the VAS and Brazil-RM score. We conclude that the Brazil-RM was successfully translated and adapted for application to Brazilian patients, with satisfactory reliability and cross-sectional construct validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11175495     DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2001000200007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


  67 in total

Review 1.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Authors:  U Müller; M S Duetz; C Roeder; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) into Brazilian Portuguese and clinimetric testing of the PGQ and Roland Morris questionnaire in pregnancy pelvic pain.

Authors:  Francine Mendonça de Luna Fagundes; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Urs Müller; Christoph Röder; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effectiveness of the back school and mckenzie techniques in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alessandra N Garcia; Francine Lb Gondo; Renata A Costa; Fábio N Cyrillo; Tatiane M Silva; Luciola C M Costa; Leonardo O P Costa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the chronic pain grade.

Authors:  Eduardo S B Bracher; Ricardo Pietrobon; José Eluf-Neto
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Can demographic and anthropometric characteristics predict clinical improvement in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain?

Authors:  Indiara Soares Oliveira; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Alessandra Narciso Garcia; Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Reliability, Construct Validity and Interpretability of the Brazilian version of the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Strain Index (SI).

Authors:  Daniela Pereira Valentim; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato; Maria Luiza Caíres Comper; Anderson Martins da Silva; Cristiana Villas Boas; Rosimeire Simprini Padula
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Back pain attitudes questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation to brazilian-portuguese and measurement properties.

Authors:  Roberto Costa Krug; J P Caneiro; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Ben Darlow; Marcelo Faria Silva; Jefferson Fagundes Loss
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Association of perceived physical overload at work with pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a 6-month longitudinal study.

Authors:  Samantha J Demarchi; Crystian B Oliveira; Marcia R Franco; Priscila K Morelhão; Thalysi M Hisamatsu; Fernanda G Silva; Tatiana M Damato; Rafael Z Pinto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.