Literature DB >> 15028445

Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Herbert Lepor1, Ledia Kaci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of intraoperative biopsy during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
METHODS: Between October 2000 and August 2002, 500 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by a single surgeon. A 2 to 3-mm circumferential biopsy was routinely obtained from the apical and bladder neck soft-tissue margin and submitted for frozen section examination. In selective cases suspicious for capsular incision, a biopsy was sent from what was believed to be the contiguous neurovascular bundle/lateral pedicle.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer was observed in 4.5%, 0.8%, and 1.6% of the intraoperative biopsies sent from the apical, bladder neck, and neurovascular bundle/lateral pedicle soft-tissue margins, respectively. Patient age, Gleason score, perineural invasion on diagnostic prostate biopsy, and clinical stage were not associated with prostate cancer at the apical soft-tissue margin. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the surgical specimen to predict cancer in the apical soft-tissue margin was 57.7%, 98.2%, 62%, 97.7%, and 96%, respectively. Intraoperative biopsy of the apical soft-tissue margin reduced the positive margin rate by 3.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: The yield of intraoperative biopsy of the bladder neck and neurovascular bundle/lateral pedicle is too low to justify it in routine practice. Biopsy of the apical soft tissue should be routinely performed to reduce the positive surgical margin rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028445     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Value of frozen section biopsies during radical prostatectomy: significance of the histological results.

Authors:  Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Robert Rabenalt; Sunjay Jain; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; Roman Ganzer; Lars-Christian Horn; Martin Burchardt; Fernando Jiménez-Cruz; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Toward microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography for intraoperative surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Young-Joong Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gregor Weirich; Michael Autenrieth; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias Heck; Kathleen Herkommer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Elmar Heinrich; Georg Schön; Frank Schiefelbein; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Chris Brew-Graves; Jack Grierson; Norman R Williams; Raj Persad; Neil Oakley; Jim M Adshead; Hartwig Huland; Alexander Haese; Greg Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Does intraoperative frozen section really predict significant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Se Young Choi; Byung Hoon Chi; Tae-Hyoung Kim; Bumjin Lim; Wonchul Lee; Dalsan You; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.