Literature DB >> 17636335

Conspecific density determines the magnitude and character of predator-induced phenotype.

Michael W McCoy1.   

Abstract

The benefits in survival gained from predator-induced phenotypes often come at a cost to other components of fitness. Therefore, the level of expression of an induced phenotype should mirror the level of risk in the environment. When a predator exhibits a saturating functional response the risk of mortality to a given prey decreases as prey density increases. Therefore, for a given predator threat, investment in defense should be lower in prey at high density relative to those at low density. In this study, I test whether the magnitude of predator-induced morphological plasticity decreases with increasing conspecific density by exposing pine woods tree frog (Hyla femoralis) tadpoles at three different densities to predators (present or absent) in a factorial experiment. Tadpole morphology was not affected by changes in density in the absence of predators. However, predators had a significant, density-dependent effect on tadpole morphology. Specifically, the magnitude of morphological response was graded and larger for animals in the low density (high risk) environment. This study demonstrates that tadpoles can modulate phenotypic plasticity in response to mortality risk as a function of both the density of conspecifics and chemical cues from predators, which suggests that they are able to detect and respond to fine-scale changes in the threat environment. In addition, this study highlights the need for analytical approaches that allow morphological plasticity studies to elucidate allometric relationships in addition to simply quantifying size-corrected traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17636335     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0795-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Complex Life Cycles in a Variable Environment: Predicting When the Timing of Metamorphosis Shifts from Resource Dependent to Developmentally Fixed.

Authors:  Brian T Hentschel
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Allometric extension.

Authors:  S Bartoletti; B D Flury; D G Nel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth.

Authors:  L VON BERTALANFFY
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia.

Authors:  Stanley I Dodson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  THE EFFECTS OF PREDATION ON THE AGE AND SIZE OF MATURITY OF PREY.

Authors:  Peter A Abrams; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  HIERARCHICAL COMPARISON OF GENETIC VARIANCE-COVARIANCE MATRICES. I. USING THE FLURY HIERARCHY.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Opposite shifts in size at metamorphosis in response to larval and metamorph predators.

Authors:  James R Vonesh; Karen M Warkentin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A PREDATOR-INDUCED POLYPHENISM IN THE GRAY TREEFROG HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS.

Authors:  S Andy McCollum; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  How fluctuating competition and phenotypic plasticity mediate species divergence.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Peter J Murphy
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  14 in total

1.  Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  An inducible morphological defence is a passive by-product of behaviour in a marine snail.

Authors:  Paul E Bourdeau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Behavioral plasticity in an invaded system: non-native whelks recognize risk from native crabs.

Authors:  Emily W Grason; Benjamin G Miner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Conspecific cues, not starvation, mediate barren urchin response to predation risk.

Authors:  Christopher J Knight; Robert P Dunn; Jeremy D Long
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Food availability determines the response to pond desiccation in anuran tadpoles.

Authors:  Urtzi Enriquez-Urzelai; Olatz San Sebastián; Núria Garriga; Gustavo A Llorente
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Copper Pollution Increases the Relative Importance of Predation Risk in an Aquatic Food Web.

Authors:  Christopher Kent Kwan; Eric Sanford; Jeremy Long
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prey responses to predator chemical cues: disentangling the importance of the number and biomass of prey consumed.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy; Justin C Touchon; Tobias Landberg; Karen M Warkentin; James R Vonesh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Density-dependent adjustment of inducible defenses.

Authors:  Ralph Tollrian; Sonja Duggen; Linda C Weiss; Christian Laforsch; Michael Kopp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mismatched anti-predator behavioral responses in predator-naïve larval anurans.

Authors:  Molly Albecker; Heather D Vance-Chalcraft
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Introducing biological realism into the study of developmental plasticity in behaviour.

Authors:  Ton G G Groothuis; Barbara Taborsky
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.