Literature DB >> 15020033

Assessment of blinding in clinical trials.

Heejung Bang1, Liyun Ni, Clarence E Davis.   

Abstract

Success of blinding is a fundamental issue in many clinical trials. The validity of a trial may be questioned if this important assumption is violated. Although thousands of ostensibly double-blind trials are conducted annually and investigators acknowledge the importance of blinding, attempts to measure the effectiveness of blinding are rarely discussed. Several published papers proposed ways to evaluate the success of blinding, but none of the methods are commonly used or regarded as standard. This paper investigates a new approach to assess the success of blinding in clinical trials. The blinding index proposed is scaled to an interval of -1 to 1, 1 being complete lack of blinding, 0 being consistent with perfect blinding and -1 indicating opposite guessing which may be related to unblinding. It has the ability to detect a relatively low degree of blinding, response bias and different behaviors in two arms. The proposed method is applied to a clinical trial of cholesterol-lowering medication in a group of elderly people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15020033     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  136 in total

1.  Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Elena Losina; James Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Systemic lactose intolerance: a new perspective on an old problem.

Authors:  S B Matthews; J P Waud; A G Roberts; A K Campbell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Methodological aspects of outcomes research.

Authors:  Rudi Hiebert; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Assessing blinding in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Ann K Hopton; Hugh Macpherson
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  A causal model for joint evaluation of placebo and treatment-specific effects in clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Richard M Kotz; Chenguang Wang; Shiling Ruan; Martin Ho
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Overdispersion models for correlated multinomial data: Applications to blinding assessment.

Authors:  V Landsman; D Landsman; C S Li; H Bang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  Assessing blinding in trials of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis based on blinding index.

Authors:  Brian Freed; Oliver Paul Assall; Gary Panagiotakis; Heejung Bang; Jongbae J Park; Alex Moroz; Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Use of dose modification schedules is effective for blinding trials of warfarin: evidence from the WASID study.

Authors:  Vicki Hertzberg; Marc Chimowitz; Michael Lynn; Cristen Chester; William Asbury; George Cotsonis
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Field assessment of a novel household-based water filtration device: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Sophie Boisson; Mbela Kiyombo; Larry Sthreshley; Saturnin Tumba; Jacques Makambo; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.

Authors:  Howard T Vernon; John J Triano; James K Ross; Steven K Tran; David M Soave; Maricelle D Dinulos
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.