Literature DB >> 31460677

Overdispersion models for correlated multinomial data: Applications to blinding assessment.

V Landsman1,2, D Landsman3, C S Li4, H Bang5.   

Abstract

Overdispersion models have been extensively studied for correlated normal and binomial data but much less so for correlated multinomial data. In this work, we describe a multinomial overdispersion model that leads to the specification of the first two moments of the outcome and allows the estimation of the global parameters using generalized estimating equations (GEE). We introduce a Global Blinding Index as a target parameter and illustrate the application of the GEE method to its estimation from (1) a clinical trial with clustering by practitioner and (2) a meta-analysis on psychiatric disorders. We examine the impact of a small number of clusters, high variability in cluster sizes, and the magnitude of the intraclass correlation on the performance of the GEE estimators of the Global Blinding Index using the data simulated from different models. We compare these estimators with the inverse-variance weighted estimators and a maximum-likelihood estimator, derived under the Dirichlet-multinomial model. Our results indicate that the performance of the GEE estimators was satisfactory even in situations with a small number of clusters, whereas the inverse-variance weighted estimators performed poorly, especially for larger values of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Our findings and illustrations may be instrumental for practitioners who analyze clustered multinomial data from clinical trials and/or meta-analysis.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dirichlet-multinomial; GEE; blinding index; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31460677      PMCID: PMC6800782          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  24 in total

1.  Small-sample adjustments for Wald-type tests using sandwich estimators.

Authors:  M P Fay; B I Graubard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Assessment of blinding in clinical trials.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Liyun Ni; Clarence E Davis
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04

3.  Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation--a VA cooperative study.

Authors:  K E James; D A Bloch; K K Lee; H C Kraemer; R K Fuller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

6.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Applications of multinomial dose-response models in developmental toxicity risk assessment.

Authors:  D Krewski; Y Zhu
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.

Authors:  Howard T Vernon; John J Triano; James K Ross; Steven K Tran; David M Soave; Maricelle D Dinulos
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  S R Lipsitz; K Kim; L Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  Blinding Assessment: One Step Forward.

Authors:  Jeehyoung Kim; Jongbae J Park; Heejung Bang; Jafar Kolahi
Journal:  Dent Hypotheses       Date:  2021-12-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.