Literature DB >> 15014215

Arrhythmia detection by patient and auto-activation in implantable loop recorders.

Ernest Ng1, Peter J Stafford, G André Ng.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Reveal Plus implantable loop recorder offers additional automatic detection of arrhythmias that may not be symptomatic. We evaluated the clinical utility of this function compared with standard patient activation.
METHODS: Over an 18 month period, 50 consecutive patients (age 54 +/- 20 years; 24 male) with unexplained dizziness, palpitations and/or syncope had ILR activations which were downloaded for analysis. Patient and auto-activation were analysed with respect to arrhythmia detection and the impact on management of patients was examined.
RESULTS: Patient symptoms were syncope in 72% and non-syncope (dizziness and/or palpitations) in 28%. There were 181 patient activation events with 16% showing symptomatic arrhythmia leading to a positive diagnosis in 8 patients. Of 682 auto-activations, detection was appropriate in 17% and inappropriate in 83% (undersensing in 76% and oversensing in 24%). In 8 patients clinically relevant arrhythmia was detected by patient activation alone. In 4 of these patients, further arrhythmia was detected by auto-activation. No patient had important arrhythmia detected only by auto-activation.
CONCLUSION: Automatic detection of asymptomatic arrhythmia did not appear to improve the diagnostic utility of the ILR in our series. The large number of stored inappropriate auto-activation events limits the ability of this function to detect clinically relevant arrhythmia. Symptom-rhythm correlation using the patient activation function remains clinically useful in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014215     DOI: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000019268.95018.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  7 in total

1.  ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography).

Authors:  M H Crawford; S J Bernstein; P C Deedwania; J P DiMarco; K J Ferrick; A Garson; L A Green; H L Greene; M J Silka; P H Stone; C M Tracy; R J Gibbons; J S Alpert; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-08-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Recurrent syncope. Experience with an implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  A D Krahn; G J Klein; R Yee
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.213

3.  Heart rhythm during syncope and presyncope: results of implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  P R Nierop; R van Mechelen; A van Elsäcker; R H Luijten; A Elhendy
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Predicting the outcome of patients with unexplained syncope undergoing prolonged monitoring.

Authors:  Andrew D Krahn; George J Klein; Adam Fitzpatrick; Karlheinz Seidl; Amir Zaidi; Allan Skanes; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope.

Authors:  Soori Sivakumaran; Andrew D Krahn; George J Klein; Jane Finan; Raymond Yee; Suzanne Renner; Allan C Skanes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Sensing issues related to the clinical use of implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  S I Chrysostomakis; N C Klapsinos; E N Simantirakis; M E Marketou; D C Kambouraki; P E Vardas
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  The etiology of syncope in patients with negative tilt table and electrophysiological testing.

Authors:  A D Krahn; G J Klein; C Norris; R Yee
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Interference by cellular telephone with an implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Alexandre Trigano; Olivier Blandeau; Samuel Levy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  New real-time loop recorder diagnosis of symptomatic arrhythmia via telemedicine.

Authors:  Eran Leshem-Rubinow; Michael Berger; Jacob Shacham; Edo Y Birati; Nomi Malov; Mira Tamari; Michal Golovner; Arie Roth
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Efficacy of diagnostic tools for detecting cardiac arrhythmias: systematic literature search.

Authors:  E Hoefman; P J E Bindels; H C P M van Weert
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  [Event-recorder].

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-25

5.  Inappropriate asystole detection in early postoperative phase after loop recorder implantation.

Authors:  Miriam Bortnik; Eraldo Occhetta; Andrea Magnani; Anna Degiovanni; Paolo Marino
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-17

6.  Cardiovascular assessment of falls in older people.

Authors:  Maw Pin Tan; Rose Anne Kenny
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.