Literature DB >> 12633638

Sensing issues related to the clinical use of implantable loop recorders.

S I Chrysostomakis1, N C Klapsinos, E N Simantirakis, M E Marketou, D C Kambouraki, P E Vardas.   

Abstract

AIMS: The newer insertable loop recorder device (Reveal Plus 9526, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis MN, U.S.A.) is equipped with auto-activation capabilities. In this study we investigated whether the new device encounters sensitivity problems in the form of oversensing or undersensing. We also tested whether body position changes influence the sensed electrogram's amplitude, therefore affecting the device's autosensing ability. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We enrolled 32 patients aged 58.1+/-11.7 years with a loop recorder implanted either in the left parasternal or in the heart's apex area, to investigate undiagnosed syncopal episodes after initial assessment. During the follow-up period (5.7+/-2.7 months), that began 6 months after the device implantation, we analysed 284 auto-recorded episodes (103 undersensed and 181 correctly sensed). No oversensing episodes were recorded. THE RECORDED QRS amplitude in five different body positions: supine, left and right lateral, sitting and standing was measured. No statistically significant changes were observed in the different postures. Even when patients were divided into subgroups according to implant site or the occurrence of undersensing episodes, no significant inter- or intra-group differences of the sensed electrogram were observed.
CONCLUSION: Undoubtedly this device is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of unexplained syncope. In the population we studied though, the device faced undersensing problems. Consequently, the device should be equipped with more advanced software for QRS morphology recognition, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the recorder. Copyright 2003 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12633638     DOI: 10.1053/eupc.2002.0301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

1.  Finite difference and lead field methods in designing implantable ECG monitor.

Authors:  Juho Väisänen; Jari Hyttinen; Jaakko Malmivuo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Wireless and inductively powered implant for measuring electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Jarno Riistama; Juho Väisänen; Sami Heinisuo; Hanna Harjunpää; Satu Arra; Kati Kokko; Maunu Mäntylä; Jutta Kaihilahti; Pekka Heino; Minna Kellomäki; Outi Vainio; Jukka Vanhala; Jukka Lekkala; Jari Hyttinen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR).

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel; Jamal Zarghami; Christian Machado; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  The Role of Implantable Cardiac Monitors in Atrial Fibrillation Management.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ciconte; Daniele Giacopelli; Carlo Pappone
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-08-31

5.  Arrhythmia detection by patient and auto-activation in implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Ernest Ng; Peter J Stafford; G André Ng
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P-wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Jang Ho Ahn; Hyunho Ryu; Il-Young Oh; Youngjin Cho; Ji Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-24

7.  Changes in R-wave amplitude at implantation are associated with gender and orientation of insertable cardiac monitor: observations from the confirm Rx™ body posture and physical activity study.

Authors:  Matthew Swale; Vincent Paul; Sinny Delacroix; Glenn Young; Luke McSpadden; Kyungmoo Ryu; David Di Fiore; Maria Santos; Isabel Tan; Andre Conradie; MyNgan Duong; Nisha Schwarz; Stephen Worthley; Stephen Pavia
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.174

8.  R-wave sensing in an implantable cardiac monitor without ECG-based preimplant mapping: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrew D Krahn; Robert A Pickett; Scott Sakaguchi; Naushad Shaik; Jian Cao; Holly S Norman; Patricia Guerrero
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 1.976

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.