Literature DB >> 30505964

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Emanuele Asti1, Daniele Bernardi1, Marco Sozzi1, Luigi Bonavina1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy has become the preferred approach for invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma because it can speed recovery and enhance patient's quality of life. Multiple minimally invasive surgical techniques have been described during the last two decades. Preoperative staging, anatomy and physiological patient's status, comorbidity, and experience of the surgical team should drive the choice of the surgical approach. The trans-thoracic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, either hybrid or totally minimal invasive, remains the preferred approach in these patients. Lymph node yield and short-term clinical outcomes have proven similar to open surgery, while quality of life appears improved. To establish a minimally invasive esophagectomy program, a steep learning curve and a multidisciplinary approach are required in order to provide optimal staging, personalized therapy, and adequate perioperative care. The role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma will continue to expand in synergy with enhanced recovery after surgery pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; laparoscopy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; thoracoscopy; trans-hiatal esophagectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505964      PMCID: PMC6232057          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.09.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  44 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Arnulf H Hölscher; Jessica Leers; Hans Fuchs; Marc Bludau; Klaus L Prenzel; E Bollschweiler; Wolfgang Schröder
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  The evolution of surgical approach for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne S Gisbertz; Eliza R C Hagens; Jelle P Ruurda; Paul M Schneider; Li Jie Tan; Sergey A Domrachev; Jens Hoeppner; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Shinji Mine; Koujiro Nishida; Yu Imamura; Takanori Kurogochi; Yuko Kitagawa; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Davide Bona; Pierre René Binyom; Alberto Peracchia
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  K W Maas; M A Cuesta; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J Roig; L Bonavina; C Rosman; S S Gisbertz; S S A Y Biere; D L van der Peet; J H Klinkenbijl; M W Hollmann; E S de Lange; H J Bonjer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Serratus anterior plane block for hybrid transthoracic esophagectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Cinzia Barbera; Pamela Milito; Michele Punturieri; Emanuele Asti; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.

Authors:  Jennifer Straatman; Nicole van der Wielen; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig; Joris J G Scheepers; Miguel A Cuesta; Misha D P Luyer; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Frans van Workum; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Procedures-A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Mehdorn; Thorben Möller; Frederike Franke; Florian Richter; Jan-Niclas Kersebaum; Thomas Becker; Jan-Hendrik Egberts
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  The role of surgery type in postoperative atrial fibrillation and in-hospital mortality in esophageal cancer patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Laite Chen; Lu Zhang; Lu Shi; Guosheng Fu; Chenyang Jiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Impact of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Among Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  LaiTe Chen; BinBin Li; ChenYang Jiang; GuoSheng Fu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.