Literature DB >> 21656071

Two-phase laparoscopic-assisted oesophago-gastrectomy: a single-unit experience of 111 consecutive cases and outcomes.

Cara R Baker1, Michael E Bailey, Yuen Soon, Sukhpal Singh, Shaun R Preston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimal access surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer is topical and demanding, and approaches vary significantly. There is little data on the hybrid technique of laparoscopic-assisted two-phase oesophago-gastrectomy (LA2OG). Here we aim to review our experience, which exceeds 10 years, of this technique for oesophageal malignancy.
METHODS: From June 1998 to May 2009, 111 patients underwent LA2OG. Patients included 84 men and 27 women with mean age 65 years (range 35-85 years). Retrospective analysis of indications, outcome, staging, complications and survival was performed.
RESULTS: The majority of resections (96%) were performed for gastro-oesophageal junction or distal oesophageal pathology. Indications included adenocarcinoma (84.7%), squamous cell carcinoma (7.2%) and high-grade dysplasia (5.4%). Of patients, 67.6% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median time for the laparoscopic phase was 207 min (range 105-600 min), and 420 min (range 210-780 min) overall. Estimated blood loss was 330 ml (range 100-1,200 ml). Median critical care and post-operative stays were 3 and 14 days, respectively. Over time, the radicality of surgery increased. From 1998 to 2001 median lymph node yield was 5, from 2002 to 2005 it was 12 nodes, and from 2006 to 2009 it was 28 nodes (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 38.7%, minor in 24.3%, with anastomotic leak rate of 5.5%. Median survival was 38.5 ± 5.4 months. Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality were 1.8 and 2.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage laparoscopic-assisted oesophago-gastrectomy is a safe staged method of developing minimal access surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer. This study provides a useful reference for comparison with other minimally invasive methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656071     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1774-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  E H Gemmill; P McCulloch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Open or minimally invasive esophagectomy: are the outcomes different?

Authors:  Jean S Bussières
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 4.  Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer?

Authors:  Irfan Qureshi; Katie S Nason; James D Luketich
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.512

5.  Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center.

Authors:  Ahmed H Hamouda; Matthew J Forshaw; Kostas Tsigritis; Greg E Jones; Aliya S Noorani; Ash Rohatgi; Abraham J Botha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization.

Authors:  Gaelle Godiris-Petit; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Isabelle Honigman; Pierre Cattan; Emile Sarfati
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

Authors:  Simon Law
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Davide Bona; Pierre René Binyom; Alberto Peracchia
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.