Literature DB >> 18283443

Postural control during kneeling.

Rinaldo André Mezzarane1, André Fabio Kohn.   

Abstract

Postural control was studied when the subject was kneeling with erect trunk in a quiet posture and compared to that obtained during quiet standing. The analysis was based on the center of pressure motion in the sagittal plane (CPx), both in the time and in the frequency domains. One could assume that postural control during kneeling would be poorer than in standing because it is a less natural posture. This could cause a higher CPx variability. The power spectral density (PSD) of the CPx obtained from the experimental data in the kneeling position (KN) showed a significant decrease at frequencies below 0.3 Hz compared to upright (UP) (P < 0.01), which indicates less sway in KN. Conversely, there was an increase in fast postural oscillations (above 0.7 Hz) during KN compared to UP (P < 0.05). The root mean square (RMS) of the CPx was higher for UP (P < 0.01) while the mean velocity (MV) was higher during KN (P < 0.05). Lack of vision had a significant effect on the PSD and the parameters estimated from the CPx in both positions. We also sought to verify whether the changes in the PSD of the CPx found between the UP and KN positions were exclusively due to biomechanical factors (e.g., lowered center of gravity), or also reflected changes in the neural processes involved in the control of balance. To reach this goal, besides the experimental approach, a simple feedback model (a PID neural system, with added neural noise and controlling an inverted pendulum) was used to simulate postural sway in both conditions (in KN the pendulum was shortened, the mass and the moment of inertia were decreased). A parameter optimization method was used to fit the CPx power spectrum given by the model to that obtained experimentally. The results indicated that the changed anthropometric parameters in KN would indeed cause a large decrease in the power spectrum at low frequencies. However, the model fitting also showed that there were considerable changes also in the neural subsystem when the subject went from standing to kneeling. There was a lowering of the proportional and derivative gains and an increase in the neural noise power. Additional increases in the neural noise power were found also when the subject closed his eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18283443     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1308-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Increased body sway at 3.5-8 Hz in patients with phobic postural vertigo.

Authors:  S Krafczyk; V Schlamp; M Dieterich; P Haberhauer; T Brandt
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing.

Authors:  William H Gage; David A Winter; James S Frank; Allan L Adkin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 4.  Physical limitations and musculoskeletal complaints associated with work in unusual or restricted postures: a literature review.

Authors:  Sean Gallagher
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2005

5.  Aging and postural control. A comparison of spontaneous- and induced-sway balance tests.

Authors:  B E Maki; P J Holliday; G R Fernie
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Normal values of patellar and ankle tendon reflex latencies.

Authors:  C J Frijns; D M Laman; M A van Duijn; H van Duijn
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Postural sway and joint kinematics during quiet standing are affected by lumbar extensor fatigue.

Authors:  Michael L Madigan; Bradley S Davidson; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Effectiveness of fingertip light contact in reducing postural sway in older people.

Authors:  Marco Baccini; Lucio A Rinaldi; Gianluca Federighi; Luca Vannucchi; Matteo Paci; Giulio Masotti
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Residual deficits from concussion as revealed by virtual time-to-contact measures of postural stability.

Authors:  Semyon Slobounov; Cheng Cao; Wayne Sebastianelli; Elena Slobounov; Karl Newell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Trunk extensor muscles fatigue affects undisturbed postural control in young healthy adults.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillerme; Baptiste Anziani; Patrice Rougier
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  5 in total

1.  Vibratory noise to the fingertip enhances balance improvement associated with light touch.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effectiveness of electrical noise in reducing postural sway: a comparison between imperceptible stimulation applied to the anterior and to the posterior leg muscles.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of Fatigue on Postural Sway and Electromyography Modulation in Young Expert Acrobatic Gymnasts and Healthy Non-trained Controls During Unipedal Stance.

Authors:  Marcos Camargo da Silva; Cristiano Rocha da Silva; Felipe Fava de Lima; Jéssica Rodriguez Lara; Jackson Paiva Gustavson; Fernando Henrique Magalhães
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Axially evoked postural reflexes: influence of task.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Danielle L Dennis; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Fingertip-Coupled Spindle Signaling Does Not Contribute to Reduce Postural Sway Under Light Touch.

Authors:  Cristiano Rocha Silva; Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.